Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants

Ten postlinguistically deaf adults who used the Nucleus Cochlear Implant System and SPEAK speech coding strategy responded to vowels, consonants, words, and sentences presented sound-only al 70, 60, and 50 dB sound-pressure level, Highest group mean scores were at a raised-to-loud level of 70 dB for consonants (73%), words (44%), and sentences (87%); the highest score for vowels (70%) was at a conversational level of 60 dB. Lowest group mean scores were at a soft level of 50 dB for vowels (56%), consonants (47%), words (10%), and sentences (29%); all except subject 7 lad some open-set speech recognition al this level. For the conversational level (60 dB), group mean scores for sentences and words were 72% and 29%, respectively, With this performance and sound-pressure level, it was observed that these subjects communicated successfully in a variety of Listening situations. Given these subjects speech recognition scores at 60 dB and the fact that 70 dB does not simulate the vocal effort used in everyday speaking situations, it is suggested that cochlear implant candidates and implantees be evaluated with speech tests presented at 60 dB instead of the customary 70 dB sound-pressure level to simulate benefit provided by implants in everyday life. Analysis of individuals' scores at the three levels for the four speech materials revealed different patterns of speech recognition among subjects (e.g., subjects 1 and 5). Future research on the relation between stimuli, sound processing, and subjects' responses associated with these different patterns may provide guidelines to select parameter values with which to man incoming sound onto an individual's electrical dynamic range between threshold and maximum acceptable loudness level to improve speech recognition. (C) 1997 Acoustical Society of America.