Effects of GA3 and GA4+7 on early bud development of apple

被引:18
作者
Bertelsen, MG
Tustin, DS
Waagepetersen, RP
机构
[1] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Aarslev, Dept Hort, DK-5792 Aarslev, Denmark
[2] Hort & Food Res Inst New Zealand Ltd, Hawkes Bay Res Ctr, Havelock N, New Zealand
[3] Danish Inst Agr Sci, Res Ctr Foulum, Dept Agr Syst, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
来源
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY | 2002年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14620316.2002.11511462
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effect of gibberellin application on the process of appendage formation and flower bud formation was studied in buds from light-flowering 'Pacific Rose' apple trees. GA(3) was applied at 300 mg 1(-1) on four dates from full bloom to eight weeks later, and buds were dissected on 11 dates from 40 to 140 d after full bloom. In a second experiment, GA(3) was applied at 100, 200 and 300 mg 1(-1) and GA(4+7) at 100 and 200 mg 1(-1), all at two weeks after full bloom. Buds from this experiment were dissected 100 d after full bloom and again 140 d after FB. Appendage formation for vegetative buds could be described by a negative asymptotic curve that reached a maximum value of 16.4 appendages. Flower bud initiation peaked in the period 90-100 d after full bloom and was completed within a 20 d period, reaching a maximum of 18.2 appendages. In both trials appendage formation was affected by bud size, which, in return, was strongly affected by GA treatments. The effect was most noticeable in the second experiment, where the majority of buds were both small and immature looking 100 d after full bloom. The rate of appendage formation in these buds was reduced, corresponding to a delay of up to 20 d. Concomitantly, flower bud initiation was delayed and prolonged. The status of the buds was affected by all GA treatments applied at two weeks after full bloom, but the effect was more pronounced in the small buds. Flower bud formation was generally over-estimated in bud samples compared with flower counts in the spring, and this posed a problem when evaluating the effect of gibberellin on appendage formation.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ABBOTT DL, 1975, FACTORS INFLUENCING, P32
[2]  
ABBOTT DL, 1977, FRUIT BUD FORMATION, P167
[3]  
Bertelsen M.G., 2000, THESIS ROYAL VET AGR
[4]  
Buban T., 1982, Horticultural Reviews, V4, P174, DOI 10.1002/9781118060773.ch6
[5]  
Carrera M., 1982, ACTA HORTIC, V124, P157, DOI [10.17660/ActaHortic.1982.124.20, DOI 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.1982.124.20]
[6]  
DENNIS FG, 1966, P AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V88, P14
[7]  
Forshey C. G., 1989, Horticultural Reviews, V11, P229, DOI 10.1002/9781118060841.ch7
[8]   MORPHOGENESIS OF APPLE BUDS .4. EFFECT OF FRUIT [J].
FULFORD, RM .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1966, 30 (120) :597-&
[9]   MORPHOGENESIS OF APPLE BUDS .I. ACTIVITY OF APICAL MERISTEM [J].
FULFORD, RM .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1965, 29 (113) :167-&
[10]   MORPHOGENESIS OF APPLE BUDS .3. INCEPTION OF FLOWERS [J].
FULFORD, RM .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1966, 30 (118) :207-&