Emerging Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:73
作者
Budny, Jacob [1 ]
Fox, Joseph [2 ]
Rauh, Michael [2 ]
Fineberg, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Penn Orthoped & Sports Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Johnstown, PA USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 462 Grider St, Buffalo, NY 14215 USA
关键词
ACL; reconstruction; trend; survey; PATELLAR TENDON; FEMORAL TUNNEL; FOLLOW-UP; AUTOGRAFT; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1579788
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed and researched orthopedic procedures. As technology and comparative research have advanced, surgical practices have changed to achieve a superior outcome. Our group performed a survey of orthopedic surgeons to evaluate current practice trends and techniques as a follow-up to similar surveys performed in 1999 and 2006. In a survey between 2013 and 2014 consisting of 35 questions regarding the surgical technique, graft choice, fixation method, and perioperative care in ACL reconstruction was sent electronically to the members of the American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Responses were recorded and compared with previous results. Survey responses were received from 824 active surgeons. Of the respondents, 89.4% are subspecialty trained, 98% of which in sports medicine. Preoperatively, full-knee extension was the only very significant factor in surgical timing. Approach preference via an arthroscopic-assisted single-incision approach predominated (89%)similar to earlier results. Bone-patellar-tendon-bone use decreased relative to hamstring allograft at 45 and 41%, respectively. Tibial tunnel placement shifted anteriorly and femoral tunnel placement shifted posterosuperiorly as compared with the results obtained 5 years ago. Femoral drilling through a low medial portal was preferred in 47% of responses, increased from 15%. Preferred fixation on both the tibial and femoral sides was either metal or bioabsorbable interference screws. The use of transfixation pins and other devices decreased. Postoperative rehab protocols did not significantly change, 68.7% preferred full-weight bearing, 55% using a range of motion knee brace locked in extension, 66.4% starting physical therapy 1week postoperatively, with unrestricted activity at 6 to 9 months. Overall, an increasing trend toward using hamstring autograft and drilling the femoral tunnel through an accessory portal in primary ACL reconstruction was observed. This may reflect recent literature supporting more anatomic reconstruction of the ACL. Considerations including deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, brace use, timing of surgery, weight-bearing restrictions, physical therapy, graft choice in athletes, and return to activity remained largely unchanged.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Double incision iso-anatomical ACL reconstruction: the freedom to place the femoral tunnel within the anatomical attachment site without exception [J].
Arnold, Markus P. ;
Duthon, Victoria ;
Neyret, Philippe ;
Hirschmann, Michael T. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) :247-251
[2]
Delay B S, 2001, Am J Knee Surg, V14, P85
[3]
Kim Ha Sung, 2013, Knee Surg Relat Res, V25, P165, DOI 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.165
[4]
Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Versus Allograft in Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Meta-analysis of 5182 Patients [J].
Kraeutler, Matthew J. ;
Bravman, Jonathan T. ;
McCarty, Eric C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (10) :2439-2448
[5]
Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Trends, Readmissions, and Subsequent Knee Surgery [J].
Lyman, Stephen ;
Koulouvaris, Panagiotis ;
Sherman, Seth ;
Do, Huong ;
Mandl, Lisa A. ;
Marx, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (10) :2321-2328
[6]
The ''N+7 rule'' for tibial tunnel placement in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Miller, MMD ;
Hinkin, DT .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (01) :124-126
[7]
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at a Minimal 2-Year Follow-up [J].
Mohtadi, Nicholas ;
Chan, Denise ;
Barber, Rhamona ;
Paolucci, Elizabeth Oddone .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2015, 25 (04) :321-331
[8]
Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction An 11-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Sajovic, Matjaz ;
Strahovnik, Andrej ;
Dernovsek, Mojca Z. ;
Skaza, Katja .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10) :2161-2169
[9]
Location of the Femoral Tunnel Aperture in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Comparison of the Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Techniques [J].
Shin, Young-Soo ;
Ro, Kyung-Han ;
Lee, Jong-Hee ;
Lee, Dae-Hee .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (11) :2533-2539
[10]
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature and Systematic Review of Clinical Results [J].
Slone, Harris S. ;
Romine, Spencer E. ;
Premkumar, Ajay ;
Xerogeanes, John W. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (03) :541-554