The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway:: A randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers

被引:14
作者
Brimacombe, JR
Keller, C
Gunkel, AR
Pühringer, F
机构
[1] Cairns Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Cairns 4870, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[3] Leopold Franzens Univ, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Leopold Franzens Univ, Dept Ear Nose & Throat Surg, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199907000-00032
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over cadaver study to test the hypothesis that the efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency with the flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) are altered by the application of a Boyle Davis (B-D) gag. We also determined the airway sealing pressure (ASP) at which the FLMA prevents aspiration when large volumes of fluid are placed above the cuff. We studied 20 adult cadavers (6-24 h postmortem). Efficacy of seal for Ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency were determined with and without a B-D gag (two blade sizes: 8 and 10 cm) for the size 3, 4, and 5 FLMA in random order. Efficacy of seal for ventilation was determined by measuring the ASP at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. Efficacy of seal for airway protection was determined by flooding the mouth with 55-135 mt of water, reducing intracuff pressure until aspiration was detected fiberoptically and measuring ASP at this intracuff pressure. Anatomic position and airway patency were determined with a fiberoptic scope at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O. In addition, in vivo compliance and ASP for the FLMA were measured in 10 cadavers and 10 paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position, and airway patency did not change with the application of a gag for any mask size. The mean range ASP at which aspiration occurred when large volumes of fluid were placed above the cuff was 11 (7-15) cm H2O. The ASP for ventilation was always higher than the ASP for airway protection (P < 0.0001). The FLMA had similar in vivo compliance and ASP in cadavers and anesthetized patients. We conclude that efficacy of seal for ventilation and airway protection, anatomic position and airway patency for the FLMA are unaffected by the application of a B-D gag in adults. ASP should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff. Implications: The flexible laryngeal mask airway forms an effective seal for ventilation and protection of the airway that is unaffected by the application of a mouth gag that provides surgical access to the oropharynx. The efficacy of the seal should be >15 cm H2O if there is a maximal risk of aspiration from above the cuff.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The flexible LMA: Literature considerations and practical guide [J].
Bailey, P ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
Keller, C .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1998, 36 (02) :111-122
[2]   An evaluation of the factors influencing selection of the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in normal adults [J].
Berry, AM ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
McManus, KF ;
Goldblatt, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (06) :565-570
[3]   A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Morris, R ;
Mecklem, D .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (04) :921-924
[4]  
BRIMACOMBE J, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P457
[5]   A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (06) :1379-1382
[6]   THE ADVANTAGES OF THE LMA OVER THE TRACHEAL TUBE OR FACEMASK - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BRIMACOMBE, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (11) :1017-1023
[7]  
Brimacombe J, 1996, LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWA, V3rd
[8]  
CORK RC, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P719
[9]   THE REINFORCED LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR ADENOTONSILLECTOMY [J].
HEATH, ML ;
SINNATHAMBY, SW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (06) :728-729
[10]   AIRWAY PROTECTION BY THE LARYNGEAL MASK - A BARRIER TO DYE PLACED IN THE PHARYNX [J].
JOHN, RE ;
HILL, S ;
HUGHES, TJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (05) :366-367