Self-determination and functional persuasion to encourage physical activity

被引:13
作者
Bailis, DS
Fleming, JA
Segall, A
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Hlth Leisure & Human Performance Res Inst, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Psychol, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Sociol, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
self-determination theory; attitude functions; functional matching; physical activity; health promotion; health-related behaviors;
D O I
10.1080/14768320500051359
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This research advances a novel approach to promoting physical activity, based on the principle of functional matching in persuasion, and the self-concordance (SC) of people's motivations for physical activity. We propose that SC establishes a positive or negative orientation toward the challenge inherent in physical activity, and that the maximum yield of participation will be achieved by communications that appeal to each orientation. In two studies, we compared how messages emphasizing challenge versus available social support would influence recipients self-reported practices of physical activity and attitudes toward a physical activity setting. As hypothesized, these messages had differential effects for recipients whose pursuit of physical activity varied in SC, such that favorable outcomes were more reliably associated with challenge-oriented messages among respondents higher in SC versus support-oriented messages among respondents lower in SC. The findings suggest the merits of using self-regulatory, compared with object- or personality-based, constructs and measures to indicate psychological functions of ongoing health-related behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 708
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General
[2]   Self-determination and social comparison in a health-promotion setting [J].
Bailis, DS ;
Segall, A .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 (01) :25-33
[3]   An introduction to deviance-regulation theory: The effect of behavioral norms on message framing [J].
Blanton, H ;
Stuart, AE ;
VandenEijnden, RJJM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (07) :848-858
[4]   Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing [J].
Chen, S ;
Shechter, D ;
Chaiken, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :262-275
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[6]  
CRAIG CL, 1998, 1997 PHYS ACTIVITY B
[7]  
Deci E. L., 1985, Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7]
[8]   Self-guide framing and persuasion: Responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels [J].
Evans, LM ;
Petty, RE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (03) :313-324
[9]  
JACCARD J, 1990, SAGE U PAPER QUANTAT, V7072
[10]   Two pathways to prevention [J].
Kaplan, RM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (04) :382-396