Efficiency of various chemical cleanings for nanofiltration membrane fouled by conventionally-treated surface water

被引:156
作者
Liikanen, R [1 ]
Yli-Kuivila, J [1 ]
Laukkanen, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Technol, Lab Environm Engn, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland
关键词
chemical cleaning; nanofiltration; membrane; surface water treatment; cleaning agents;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00569-5
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Nanofiltration systems are generally cleaned chemically. The optimal choice of the cleaning agent is a function of membrane material and foulant in a complex manner. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency and effects of several cleaning agents on NF255 nanofiltration membrane. The nanofiltration pilot plant was fed with conventionally-treated surface water from a water treatment plant in southern Finland. Fouled membranes were cleaned weekly with different chemicals and procedures, and the cleaning efficiencies were compared in terms of flux recoveries and foulant removals. On the basis of the cleaning chemical analysis, the fouling material consisted of biofouling, organic deposits and metal complexes. In these circumstances, alkaline cleaners with chelatants resulted in the most efficient cleaning both in terms of flux recovery and foulant removal. Alkaline cleaning modified the membrane and improved the flux substantially in comparison to the virgin state. The results demonstrate that the choice of chemical cleaning agent is critical to cleaning efficiency, both technically and economically. The same flux recovery could be reached either by a single cleaning phase or by three sequential cleaning phases. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 276
页数:12
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*AM WAT WORKS ASS, 1999, AWWA MAN M46 REV OSM
[2]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITATIVE MEMBRANE CLEANING MODEL [J].
BARTLETT, M ;
BIRD, MR ;
HOWELL, JA .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1995, 105 (1-2) :147-157
[3]   Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects [J].
Braghetta, A ;
DiGiano, FA ;
Ball, WP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (07) :628-641
[4]   THE USE OF ANIONIC SURFACTANTS FOR REDUCING FOULING OF ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES - THEIR EFFECTS AND OPTIMIZATION [J].
CHEN, V ;
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1992, 67 (2-3) :249-261
[5]  
DEQIAN R, 1987, DESALINATION, V62, P363
[6]   CLEANING AND REGENERATION OF MEMBRANES IN DESALINATION AND WASTE-WATER APPLICATIONS - STATE-OF-THE-ART [J].
EBRAHIM, S .
DESALINATION, 1994, 96 (1-3) :225-238
[7]   A PILOT-STUDY ON GROUNDWATER NATURAL ORGANICS REMOVAL BY LOW-PRESSURE MEMBRANES [J].
FU, P ;
RUIZ, H ;
LOZIER, J ;
THOMPSON, K ;
SPANGENBERG, C .
DESALINATION, 1995, 102 (1-3) :47-56
[8]   Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes [J].
Hong, SK ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 132 (02) :159-181
[9]  
MANTTARI M, 1999, FOULING MANAGEMENT R
[10]   Enzymatic and detergent cleaning of a polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane fouled with BSA and whey [J].
MunozAguado, MJ ;
Wiley, DE .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 117 (1-2) :175-187