Comparison of Vibrio and firefly luciferases as reporter gene systems for use in bacteria and plants

被引:22
作者
Mudge, SR [1 ]
LewisHenderson, WR [1 ]
Birch, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV QUEENSLAND, DEPT BOT, ST LUCIA, QLD 4072, AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | 1996年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1071/PP9960075
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Luciferase genes from Vibrio harveyi (luxAB) and firefly (luc) were introduced into E. coli, Agrobacterium, Arabidopsis and tobacco. Transformed bacteria and plants were quantitatively assayed for luciferase activity using a range of in vitro and in vivo assay conditions. Both lux and luc proved efficient reporter genes in bacteria, although it is important to be aware that the sensitive assays may detect expression due to readthrough from distant promoters. LUX activity was undetectable by liquid nitrogen-cooled CCD camera assays on intact tissues of plants which showed strong luxAB expression by in vitro assays. The decanal substrate for the lux assay was toxic to many plant tissues, and caused chemiluminescence in untransformed Arabidopsis leaves. These are serious limitations to application of the lux system for sensitive, non-toxic assays of reporter gene expression in plants. In contrast, LUC activity was readily detectable in intact tissues of all plants with luc expression detectable by luminometer assays on cell extracts. Image intensities of he-expressing leaves were commonly two to four orders of magnitude above controls under the CCD camera. Provided adequate penetration of the substrate luciferin is obtained, luc is suitable for applications requiring sensitive, non-toxic assays of reporter gene expression in plants.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ABELES FB, 1986, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V37, P49, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.37.060186.000405
[2]   BINARY AGROBACTERIUM VECTORS FOR PLANT TRANSFORMATION [J].
BEVAN, M .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1984, 12 (22) :8711-8721
[3]  
BOYLAN M, 1989, J BIOL CHEM, V264, P1915
[4]  
BRASIER AR, 1990, CURRENT PROTOCOLS MO
[5]   THE USE OF THE EMU PROMOTER WITH ANTIBIOTIC AND HERBICIDE RESISTANCE GENES FOR THE SELECTION OF TRANSGENIC WHEAT CALLUS AND RICE PLANTS [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, DA ;
BRETTELL, RIS ;
LAST, DI ;
WITRZENS, B ;
MCELROY, D ;
DOLFERUS, R ;
DENNIS, ES .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 21 (01) :95-112
[6]  
COHN DH, 1985, J BIOL CHEM, V260, P6139
[7]   INFLUENCE OF FLANKING SEQUENCES ON VARIABILITY IN EXPRESSION LEVELS OF AN INTRODUCED GENE IN TRANSGENIC TOBACCO PLANTS [J].
DEAN, C ;
JONES, J ;
FAVREAU, M ;
DUNSMUIR, P ;
BEDBROOK, J .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1988, 16 (19) :9267-9283
[8]  
DeLuca M., 1978, METHOD ENZYMOL, V57, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/0076-6879(78)57003-1
[9]   FIREFLY LUCIFERASE GENE - STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION IN MAMMALIAN-CELLS [J].
DEWET, JR ;
WOOD, KV ;
DELUCA, M ;
HELINSKI, DR ;
SUBRAMANI, S .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 7 (02) :725-737
[10]   IDENTIFICATION OF AN ESSENTIAL UPSTREAM ELEMENT IN THE NOPALINE SYNTHASE PROMOTER BY STABLE AND TRANSIENT ASSAYS [J].
EBERT, PR ;
HA, SB ;
AN, GH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1987, 84 (16) :5745-5749