Post-transcriptional gene silencing of GBSSI in potato: Effects of size and sequence of the inverted repeats

被引:26
作者
Heilersig, HJB [1 ]
Loonen, A [1 ]
Bergervoet, M [1 ]
Wolters, AMA [1 ]
Visser, RGF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen, Dept Plant Sci, Plant Breeding Lab, Grad Sch Expt Plant Sci, NL-6700 AJ Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
dsRNA; granule-bound starch synthase; inverted repeat; post-transcriptional gene silencing; potato;
D O I
10.1007/s11103-005-5280-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the past, silencing of granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) in potato was achieved by antisense technology, where it was observed that inclusion of the 3' end of the GBSSI coding region increased silencing efficiency. Since higher silencing efficiencies were desired, GBSSI inverted repeat constructs were designed and tested in potato. First, large inverted repeats comprising the 5' and the 3' half of the GBSSI cDNA were tested. The 5' IR construct gave a significantly higher silencing efficiency than the 3' IR construct. Since it was not known whether the observed difference was due to the sequence or the orientation of the inverted repeat, the GBSSI cDNA was divided into three regions, after which each region was tested in small inverted repeats in two orientations. To this end large numbers of independent transformants were produced for each construct. The results suggested that there was no effect of inverted repeat orientation on silencing efficiency. The percentage of transformants showing strong inhibition varied from 48% for a 3'-derived construct to 87% for a 5' as well as a middle region-derived construct. Similar to the large inverted repeats, the 3' sequences induced the least efficient silencing implying that the observed differences in silencing efficiency are caused by sequence differences. The small inverted repeat constructs with a repeat size of 500-600 bp and a spacer of about 150 bp were more efficient silencing inducers than the large inverted repeat constructs where the size of the repeat was 1.1 or 1.3 kb whilst the size of spacer was 1.3 or 1.1 kb. The results presented here show that size and sequence of the inverted repeat influenced silencing efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 662
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Suppression of gene expression by RNA interference in cultured plant cells [J].
Akashi, H ;
Miyagishi, M ;
Taira, K .
ANTISENSE & NUCLEIC ACID DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 11 (06) :359-367
[2]   Consistent gene silencing in transgenic plants expressing a replicating potato virus X RNA [J].
Angell, SM ;
Baulcombe, DC .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (12) :3675-3684
[3]   Comparison of the electrophoretic and hydrodynamic properties of DNA and RNA oligonucleotide duplexes [J].
Bonifacio, GF ;
Brown, T ;
Conn, GL ;
Lane, AN .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 73 (03) :1532-1538
[4]   Specific degradation of 3′ regions of GUS mRNA in posttranscriptionally silenced tobacco lines may be related to 5′-3′ spreading of silencing [J].
Braunstein, TH ;
Moury, B ;
Johannessen, M ;
Albrechtsen, M .
RNA, 2002, 8 (08) :1034-1044
[5]   RNA interference: traveling in the cell and gaining functions? [J].
Cerutti, H .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2003, 19 (01) :39-46
[6]   THE PMTL NIC-CLONING VECTORS .1. IMPROVED PUC POLYLINKER REGIONS TO FACILITATE THE USE OF SONICATED DNA FOR NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING [J].
CHAMBERS, SP ;
PRIOR, SE ;
BARSTOW, DA ;
MINTON, NP .
GENE, 1988, 68 (01) :139-149
[7]   Transgene silencing of the al-1 gene in vegetative cells of Neurospora is mediated by a cytoplasmic effector and does not depend on DNA-DNA interactions or DNA methylation [J].
Cogoni, C ;
Irelan, JT ;
Schumacher, M ;
Schmidhauser, TJ ;
Selker, EU ;
Macino, G .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1996, 15 (12) :3153-3163
[8]   A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop [J].
de Vetten, N ;
Wolters, AM ;
Raemakers, K ;
van der Meer, I ;
ter Stege, R ;
Heeres, E ;
Heeres, P ;
Visser, R .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (04) :439-442
[9]   RNA interference is mediated by 21-and 22-nucleotide RNAs [J].
Elbashir, SM ;
Lendeckel, W ;
Tuschl, T .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 15 (02) :188-200
[10]  
English JJ, 1996, PLANT CELL, V8, P179, DOI 10.1105/tpc.8.2.179