The Mask Error Factor: Causes and implications for process latitude

被引:32
作者
van Schoot, J [1 ]
Finders, J [1 ]
Schenau, KV [1 ]
Klaassen, M [1 ]
Buijk, C [1 ]
机构
[1] ASML BV, NL-5503 LA Veldhoven, Netherlands
来源
OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XII, PTS 1 AND 2 | 1999年 / 3679卷
关键词
D O I
10.1117/12.354338
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In this paper, a broader understanding of the so called Mask Error Factor (MEF) will be described. MEF is defined as the ratio of the measured CD range on the wafer and the expected CD range due to the reticle. As a result, the MEF plays a very important role in the final CD range as observed on the wafer. It will be shown that the MEF can be controlled by Numerical Aperture (NA), illuminator settings, process conditions and resist type. Since the optimum conditions for Depth of Focus (DoF) will usually be found at different settings than the optimum for MEF, DoF has to be balanced with MEF in order to achieve a minimized CD uniformity over a required focus range. We will show experimental results for different illumination settings (e.g. quadrupole versus annular illumination). Results for contact holes, isolated lines and dense lines and spaces will be presented. Smaller resolutions, especially line widths below the exposure wavelength, will yield a higher MEF. In turn, decreasing reticle CD's yield reticles where CD uniformity is judged to have worse reticle quality. This stresses the importance of understanding and being able to control the MEF.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 260
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Performance of a step and scan system for DUV lithography [J].
deZwart, G ;
vandenBrink, M ;
George, R ;
Satriasaputra, D ;
Baselmans, J ;
Butler, H ;
vanSchoot, J ;
deKlerk, J .
OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY X, 1997, 3051 :817-835
[2]  
FLAGELLO D, 1998, MNE
[3]  
MACK C, 1997, INSIDE PROLITH
[4]  
MAURER W, 1996, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2726, P133
[5]  
RONSE K, INT 95 P, P241
[6]  
SCHENAU KV, 1997, P OL MICR SEM, P41
[7]  
SOHN JM, 1996, PHOTOMASK JAPAN
[8]  
TSUDAKA K, 1994, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2254, P216, DOI 10.1117/12.191933
[9]  
VANSCHOOT J, 1998, P SEM KOR
[10]  
WAELPOEL J, 1997, P SPIE, V3236