The Influence of Barrier Membranes on Autologous Bone Grafts

被引:38
作者
Gielkens, P. F. M. [1 ]
Schortinghuis, J. [1 ]
de Jong, J. R. [2 ]
Paans, A. M. J. [2 ]
Ruben, J. L. [3 ]
Raghoebar, G. M. [1 ]
Stegenga, B. [1 ]
Bos, R. R. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Dent & Dent Hygiene, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Bone resorption; bone transplantation; membrane; artificial; microradiography; micro-CT;
D O I
10.1177/154405910808701107
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
In implant dentistry, there is continuing debate regarding whether a barrier membrane should be applied to cover autologous bone grafts in jaw augmentation. A membrane would prevent graft remodeling with resorption and enhance graft incorporation. We hypothesized that membrane coverage does not effect resorption and incorporation of autologous onlay bone grafts. We treated 192 male Sprague-Dawley rats. A 4.0-mm-diameter bone graft was harvested from the right mandibular angle and transplanted to the left. Poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone), collagen, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes were used to cover the grafts. The controls were left uncovered. Graft resorption at 2, 4, and 12 weeks was evaluated by post mortem microradiography and microCT. Analysis of the data showed no significant differences among the 4 groups. This demonstrates that the indication of barrier membrane use, to prevent bone remodeling with resorption and to enhance incorporation of autologous onlay bone grafts, is at least disputable.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1052
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
ROLE OF OSTEOPROMOTION IN EXPERIMENTAL BONE-GRAFTING TO THE SKULL - A STUDY IN ADULT-RATS USING A MEMBRANE TECHNIQUE [J].
ALBERIUS, P ;
DAHLIN, C ;
LINDE, A .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1992, 50 (08) :829-834
[2]
[Anonymous], 1994, GUIDED BONE REGENERA
[3]
A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane [J].
Antoun, H ;
Sitbon, JM ;
Martinez, H ;
Missika, P .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (06) :632-639
[4]
A prospective clinical evaluation of biodegradable neurolac nerve guides for sensory nerve repair in the hand [J].
Bertleff, MJOE ;
Meek, MF ;
Nicolai, JPA .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 30A (03) :513-518
[5]
Buser D, 1996, J ORAL MAXILLOFAC SU, V54, P432
[6]
Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with e-PTFE membranes for the reconstruction of narrow edentulous ridges [J].
Chiapasco, M ;
Abati, S ;
Romeo, E ;
Vogel, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (04) :278-288
[7]
Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogeneic cortico-cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration [J].
Donos, N ;
Kostopoulos, L ;
Karring, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02) :192-202
[8]
Augmentation of the mandible with GTR and onlay cortical bone grafting - An experimental study in the rat [J].
Donos, N ;
Kostopoulos, L ;
Karring, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02) :175-184
[9]
A comparison of micro-CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research [J].
Gielkens, Pepijn F. M. ;
Schortinghuis, Jurjen ;
de Jong, Johan R. ;
Huysmans, Marie Charlotte D. N. J. M. ;
van Leeuwen, M. Barbara M. ;
Raghoebar, Gerry M. ;
Bos, Ruud R. M. ;
Stegenga, Boudewijn .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (06) :558-566
[10]
Gielkens PFM, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P390