Content validity for dementia of three generic preference based health related quality of life instruments

被引:50
作者
Silberfeld, M
Rueda, S
Krahn, M
Naglie, G
机构
[1] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Competency Clin, Dept Psychiat, Joint Ctr Bioeth, N York, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Collaborat Program Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Univ Hlth Network, Div Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Adm, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Div Gen Internal Med, Univ Hlth Network, Geriatr Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Care Res Program, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
aged; health state preference values; health status indicators; health values; patient preference; quality of life; reproducibility of results; utility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014406429385
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A semi-structured interview was conducted with dementia patients and their caregivers in order to explore which aspects of quality of life were perceived as relevant and important. These aspects of quality of life were compared with the content of three generic utility-based quality of life instruments: European Quality of Life Instrument, Health Utilities Index, and Quality of Well-Being (QWB) Scale. Twenty patients with mild dementia and 20 caregiver volunteers provided narrative data derived from interviews that were analyzed using a modified Grounded Theory method of analysis. Essential attributes of dementia quality of life identified by the respondents were missing in the three utility-based quality of life instruments selected for the study. Patients provided a wider range of attributes than the instruments including some attributes not described by caregivers. Of the three utility-based measures, the QWB scale included the largest number of quality of life attributes but still missed many. Compared to the respondent generated attributes all three utility-based quality of life instruments have important shortcomings in content validity.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Acton G J, 1999, J Gerontol Nurs, V25, P6
[2]  
Bennett JM, 2000, J HIST SEXUALITY, V9, P1
[3]   METHODOLOGIC CHALLENGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF UTILITY MEASURES OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
BENNETT, K ;
TORRANCE, G ;
TUGWELL, P .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S118-S128
[4]  
Bennett KJ, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P1796
[5]   Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL) [J].
Brod, M ;
Stewart, AL ;
Sands, L ;
Walton, P .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1999, 39 (01) :25-35
[6]  
Burgener S C, 1999, J Gerontol Nurs, V25, P33
[7]  
DAVID P, 1991, AM J ALZHEIMERS JUL, P10
[8]  
DEJONG R, 1989, CLIN THER, V11, P545
[9]   ESTIMATED PREVALENCE OF ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
EVANS, DA .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1990, 68 (02) :267-289
[10]   PREVALENCE OF ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE IN A COMMUNITY POPULATION OF OLDER PERSONS - HIGHER THAN PREVIOUSLY REPORTED [J].
EVANS, DA ;
FUNKENSTEIN, H ;
ALBERT, MS ;
SCHERR, PA ;
COOK, NR ;
CHOWN, MJ ;
HEBERT, LE ;
HENNEKENS, CH ;
TAYLOR, JO .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (18) :2551-2556