Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people

被引:394
作者
Coast, Joanna [1 ]
Flynn, Terry N. [2 ]
Natarajan, Lucy [3 ]
Sproston, Kerry [3 ]
Lewis, Jane [3 ]
Louviere, Jordan J. [4 ]
Peters, Tim J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Hlth Econ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Natl Ctr Social Res, London, England
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
UK; capability; older people; best-worst scaling; outcome measurement; ICECAP instrument; quality of life (QoL);
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
This paper reports the first application of the capabilities approach to the development and valuation of an instrument for use in the economic evaluation of health and social care interventions. The ICECAP index of capability for older people focuses on quality Of life rather than health or other influences on quality of life, and is intended to be used in decision making across health and social care in the UK. The measure draws on previous qualitative work in which five conceptual attributes were developed: attachment, security, role, enjoyment and control. This paper details the innovative use within health economics of further iterative qualitative work in the UK among 19 informants to refine lay terminology for each of the attributes and levels of attributes used in the eventual index. For the first time within quality of life measurement for economic evaluation, a best-worst scaling exercise has been used to estimate general population values (albeit for the population of those aged 65+ years) for the levels of attributes, with values anchored at one for full capability and zero for no capability. Death was assumed to be a state in which there is no capability. The values obtained indicate that attachment is the attribute with greatest impact but all attributes contribute to the total estimation of capability. Values that were estimated are feasible for use in practical applications of the index to measure the impact of health and social care interventions. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 882
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Alkire S., 2005, J HUMAN DEV, V6, P115, DOI [DOI 10.1080/146498805200034275, https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034275]
[2]
Anand P., 2006, J SOCIO-ECON, V35, P268, DOI [10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.003, DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2005.11.003]
[3]
Anand S., 1994, HUMAN DEV REPORT OFF
[4]
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[5]
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[6]
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE PERSPEC
[7]
Boreham R, 2002, NATL SURVEYS NHS PAT
[9]
Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values? [J].
Coast, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7476) :1233-1236
[10]
QALYs, and the capability approach [J].
Cookson, R .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (08) :817-829