Differential empirical innovation factors for Spain and the UK

被引:33
作者
Mate-Sanchez-Val, Mariluz [1 ]
Harris, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham DH1 3HP, England
关键词
Innovation; Regional policies; Industrial companies; National innovation systems; Advanced and retarded regions; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; GROWTH; FIRM; PRODUCTIVITY; SPILLOVERS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study considers the role of national differences, derived from structural characteristics in each country, and how they impact on companies' innovation. To do this we include in a firm-level empirical model of innovation traditional factors impacting on innovation, and measure any differences in these determinants between two countries: the UK (comprising more advanced regions) and Spain (which belongs to the "follower" groups of countries in Europe). Using the European Community Innovation Surveys (CIS4), we select two samples comprising private manufacturing firms and estimate a two-step Heckman model to explain firms' innovation. Our results suggest that Spanish firms are at a different stage, with Spain lagging behind the UK in terms of being able to benefit from R&D. Thus in Spain, we find that public support is more important in promoting innovation activities: whereas linkages with international markets are more important for companies in the UK. Based on our results, we would argue that in order to reduce the technological gap between these two countries regional policies to promote innovation in Spain should concentrate more on the promotion of market relationships between co-located firms; while a greater exposure to internationalisation would benefit both countries. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 463
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS AND RECIPIENT FIRM SIZE [J].
ACS, ZJ ;
AUDRETSCH, DB ;
FELDMAN, MP .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1994, 76 (02) :336-340
[2]   From Concept to Policy: Building Regional Innovation Systems in Follower Regions [J].
Almeida, Alexandre ;
Figueiredo, Antonio ;
Silva, Mario Rui .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2011, 19 (07) :1331-1356
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Cities and Geography, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Oslo manual: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, V3rd
[5]   Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity:: Evidence from Spanish firms [J].
Arbussa, Anna ;
Coenders, Germa .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (10) :1545-1558
[6]  
Asheim B.T., 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.003.0011
[7]   Innovation across Europe: How important are institutional differences? [J].
Barbosa, Natalia ;
Faria, Ana Paula .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (09) :1157-1169
[8]   From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU [J].
Bilbao-Osorio, B ;
Rodríguez-Pose, A .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (04) :434-455
[9]   Innovation and R&D spillover effects in Spanish regions:: A spatial approach [J].
Cabrer-Borras, Bernardi ;
Serrano-Domingo, Guadalupe .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (09) :1357-1371
[10]   Technological learning for entrepreneurial development (TL4ED) in the knowledge economy (KE): Case studies and lessons learned [J].
Carayannis, EG ;
Popescu, D ;
Sipp, C ;
Stewart, M .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (04) :419-443