Demographic biases of scoring instruments for the results of total knee arthroplasty

被引:44
作者
Brinker, MR [1 ]
Lund, PJ [1 ]
Barrack, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] TULANE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,NEW ORLEANS,LA 70112
关键词
D O I
10.2106/00004623-199706000-00009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Four knee-scoring systems were used to evaluate 200 adult subjects who had no history of injury, abnormality, or treatment of the knees, hips, lower extremities, or spine, All subjects were in the age-range (fifty to 100 years; average, 65.5 years) typical of candidates for total knee replacement, In addition to a physical examination, complete demographic data were collected for each subject, The knee scores were normalized by dividing the observed score by the maximum possible score, The average normalized total knee score was 91 per cent (range, 22 to 100 per cent) according to the knee score of The Hospital for Special Surgery, 95 per cent (range, 10 to 100 per cent) according to the system of Hungerford and Kenna, 89 per cent (range, -7.75 to 100 per cent) according to a modification of the scoring system of The Knee Society, and 95 per cent (range, 26.5 to 100 per cent) according to the system of Hofmann et al, Demographic variables that had a significant negative correlation with the knee scores included advanced age (particularly of eighty-five years or more), a family income below the poverty level, and two major medical conditions or more, Observed differences in knee scores between different study groups that have not been matched for various clinically relevant factors are at least as likely to represent differences in the patient populations as they are to represent differences in the operative technique or the design of the implant.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 865
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH - NO EASY SOLUTION [J].
ADLER, NE ;
BOYCE, WT ;
CHESNEY, MA ;
FOLKMAN, S ;
SYME, SL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (24) :3140-3145
[2]  
Andersson G, 1972, J Bone Joint Surg Br, V54, P621
[3]   AN ASSESSMENT OF ASSESSMENT [J].
APLEY, AG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1990, 72 (06) :957-958
[4]   Demographic biases pound in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty [J].
Brinker, MR ;
Lund, PJ ;
Cox, DD ;
Barrack, RL .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (07) :820-830
[5]   A STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF HIP SCORES [J].
BRYANT, MJ ;
KERNOHAN, WG ;
NIXON, JR ;
MOLLAN, RAB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05) :705-709
[6]   ASSESSING THE RESULTS OF HIP-REPLACEMENT - A COMPARISON OF 5 DIFFERENT RATING SYSTEMS [J].
CALLAGHAN, JJ ;
DYSART, SH ;
SAVORY, CF ;
HOPKINSON, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1990, 72 (06) :1008-1009
[7]   PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRICOMPARTMENTAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CALLAHAN, CM ;
DRAKE, BG ;
HECK, DA ;
DITTUS, RS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (17) :1349-1357
[8]  
Charnley J., 1979, Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice, P20
[9]  
CONSTANT CR, 1996, THESIS U COLL CORK I
[10]  
Dorey F, 1993, Instr Course Lect, V42, P555