Polyaminocarboxylic acids rejection by charged nanofiltration membrane

被引:8
作者
Sorin, A.
Favre-Reguillon, A.
Pellet-Rostaing, S.
Bernier, G.
Lemaire, M.
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, Lab Catalyse & Synth Organ, UMR 5181,CPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[2] Conservatoire Natl Arts & Metiers, CNRS, Chim Organ Lab, UMR 7084, F-75003 Paris, France
[3] CEA, DEN, DRCP, SCPS,LCSE, F-30207 Bagnols Sur Ceze, France
关键词
nanofiltration; polyaminocarboxylic acids; isoelectric point; Donnan exclusion;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.037
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to investigate the mechanisms behind the rejection of polyaminocarboxylic acids, especially the influence of membrane and solute properties. The rejections of five polyaminocarboxylic acids by commercially available charged nanofiltration membrane (Desal GH, Osmonics) were studied at constant ionic strength, pressure and temperature as a function of the pH. The rejections of polyaminocarboxylic acids with Desal GH spiral-wound membrane varied from 10 to 99% at pH ranging from 1 to 7. Findings of this study indicated that the rejection of polyaminocarboxylic acids was primarily driven by Dorman exclusion and correlated with the net charge of the solute which could be calculated using protonation constants. The effects of molecular weight and molecular parameters on rejection were studied when polyaminocarboxylic acids had a net charge close to zero. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 452
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Hyperquad simulation and speciation (HySS): a utility program for the investigation of equilibria involving soluble and partially soluble species [J].
Alderighi, L ;
Gans, P ;
Ienco, A ;
Peters, D ;
Sabatini, A ;
Vacca, A .
COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 1999, 184 :311-318
[2]   Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review [J].
Bellona, C ;
Drewes, JE ;
Xu, P ;
Amy, G .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (12) :2795-2809
[3]   The role of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes [J].
Bellona, C ;
Drewes, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 249 (1-2) :227-234
[4]   Retention of ions in nanofiltration at various ionic strength [J].
Chaufer, B ;
RabillerBaudry, M ;
Guihard, L ;
Daufin, G .
DESALINATION, 1996, 104 (1-2) :37-46
[5]   Influences of molecular weight, molecular size, flux, and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membranes [J].
Chen, SS ;
Taylor, JS ;
Mulford, LA ;
Norris, CD .
DESALINATION, 2004, 160 (02) :103-111
[6]   New cesium-selective hydrophilic ligands: UV measures of their interactions toward Cs and Cs/Na separation by nanofiltration complexation [J].
Chitry, F ;
Pellet-Rostaing, S ;
Nicod, L ;
Gass, JL ;
Foos, J ;
Guy, A ;
Lemaire, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2000, 104 (17) :4121-4128
[7]   Separation of americium(III) from lanthanides(III) by nanofiltration-complexation in aqueous medium [J].
Chitry, F ;
Pellet-Rostaing, S ;
Guy, A ;
Foos, J ;
Lemaire, M .
JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2002, 251 (01) :155-157
[8]   NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE AND POTENTIOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE PROTONATION SCHEME OF 2 TETRAAZA TETRAACETIC MACROCYCLES [J].
DESREUX, JF ;
MERCINY, E ;
LONCIN, MF .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1981, 20 (04) :987-991
[9]   Selective concentration of uranium from seawater by nanofiltration [J].
Favre-Reguillon, A ;
Lebuzit, G ;
Foos, J ;
Guy, A ;
Draye, M ;
Lemaire, M .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (23) :5900-5904
[10]  
Garem A, 1997, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V54, P291, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970520)54:4<291::AID-BIT1>3.0.CO