Private costs and public benefits: unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior

被引:145
作者
Goeree, JK
Holt, CA
Laury, SK [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Econ, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
alruism; public good; contribution model; experiment;
D O I
10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00160-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An increase in the common marginal value of a public good has two effects: it increases the benefit of a contribution to others, and it reduces the net cost of making a contribution. These two effects can be decomposed by letting a contribution have an 'internal' return for oneself that differs from the 'external' return to someone else. We use this framework in a series of one-shot public goods games in which subjects make choices in ten treatments with no feedback. Contributions are generally increasing in the external return and group size, which suggests that altruism in this context is not simply of the 'warm glow' variety, i.e. giving only for the sake of giving. Contributions are also increasing in the internal return, indicating that decisions are sensitive to the costs of helping others. We specify a logit equilibrium model in which individuals are motivated by own and others' earnings, and in which choice is stochastic. Maximum likelihood estimates of (representative-agent) altruism and logit parameters are significant and of reasonable magnitudes, and the resulting two-parameter model tracks the pattern of contributions across the ten treatments. A richer model reveals some differences in individual altruism coefficients, with more dispersion among male subjects. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 276
页数:22
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A theoretical analysis of altruism and decision error in public goods games [J].
Anderson, SP ;
Goeree, JK ;
Holt, CA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 70 (02) :297-323
[2]  
ANDREONI J, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P891
[3]  
ANDREONI J, 1999, IN PRESS Q J EC
[4]  
ANDREONI J, 2000, GIVING ACCORDING GAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], Q J EC
[6]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[7]  
BRANDTS J, 1995, TACIT COOPERATION NO
[8]  
Carter J. R., 1992, TEST RATIONAL ALTRUI
[9]  
CHEWNING EG, 2000, IN PRESS RES EXPT EC
[10]  
GOEREE JK, 2000, EXPLANATION ANOMALOU