The interRAI Acute Care instrument incorporated in an eHealth system for standardized and web-based geriatric assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the acute hospital setting

被引:15
作者
Devriendt, Els [1 ,2 ]
Wellens, Nathalie I. H. [1 ]
Flamaing, Johan [2 ,3 ]
Declercq, Anja [4 ]
Moons, Philip [1 ]
Boonen, Steven [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Milisen, Koen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Internal Med, Div Geriatr Med, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Clin & Expt Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res, Policy Res Ctr Welf Publ Hlth & Family, Lucas Ctr Care Res & Consultancy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Univ Ctr Metab Bone Dis, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Aged; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Hospital; InterRAI Acute Care; Software; SWOT-analysis; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2318-13-90
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
030301 [社会学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: The interRAI Acute Care instrument is a multidimensional geriatric assessment system intended to determine a hospitalized older persons' medical, psychosocial and functional capacity and needs. Its objective is to develop an overall plan for treatment and long-term follow-up based on a common set of standardized items that can be used in various care settings. A Belgian web-based software system (BelRAI-software) was developed to enable clinicians to interpret the output and to communicate the patients' data across wards and care organizations. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the (dis)advantages of the implementation of the interRAI Acute Care instrument as a comprehensive geriatric assessment instrument in an acute hospital context. Methods: In a cross-sectional multicenter study on four geriatric wards in three acute hospitals, trained clinical staff (nurses, occupational therapists, social workers, and geriatricians) assessed 410 inpatients in routine clinical practice. The BelRAI-system was evaluated by focus groups, observations, and questionnaires. The Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats were mapped (SWOT-analysis) and validated by the participants. Results: The primary strengths of the BelRAI-system were a structured overview of the patients' condition early after admission and the promotion of multidisciplinary assessment. Our study was a first attempt to transfer standardized data between home care organizations, nursing homes and hospitals and a way to centralize medical, allied health professionals and nursing data. With the BelRAI-software, privacy of data is guaranteed. Weaknesses are the time-consuming character of the process and the overlap with other assessment instruments or (electronic) registration forms. There is room for improving the user-friendliness and the efficiency of the software, which needs hospital-specific adaptations. Opportunities are a timely and systematic problem detection and continuity of care. An actual shortage of funding of personnel to coordinate the assessment process is the most important threat. Conclusion: The BelRAI-software allows standardized transmural information transfer and the centralization of medical, allied health professionals and nursing data. It is strictly secured and follows strict privacy regulations, allowing hospitals to optimize (transmural) communication and interaction. However, weaknesses and threats exist and must be tackled in order to promote large scale implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Second and third generation assessment instruments: The birth of standardization in geriatric care [J].
Bernabei, Roberto ;
Landi, Francesco ;
Onder, Graziano ;
Liperoti, Rosa ;
Garnbassi, Giovanni .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 63 (03) :308-313
[2]
Carpenter GI, 2001, AGING-CLIN EXP RES, V13, P316
[3]
CASEBEER A, 1993, BRIT J HOSP MED, V49, P430
[4]
MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[5]
Comprehensive geriatric assessment 'online' [J].
Gray, Len ;
Wootton, Richard .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2008, 27 (04) :205-208
[6]
Standardizing assessment of elderly people in acute care:: The interRAI acute care instrument [J].
Gray, Len C. ;
Bernabei, Roberto ;
Berg, Katherine ;
Finne-Soveri, Harriet ;
Fries, Brant E. ;
Hirdes, John P. ;
Jonsson, Palmi V. ;
Morris, John N. ;
Steel, Knight ;
Arino-Blasco, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (03) :536-541
[7]
Sharing clinical information across care settings: the birth of an integrated assessment system [J].
Gray, Leonard C. ;
Berg, Katherine ;
Fries, Brant E. ;
Henrard, Jean-Claude ;
Hirdes, John P. ;
Steel, Knight ;
Morris, John N. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
[8]
PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT OF INDEX OF ADL [J].
KATZ, S ;
DOWNS, TD ;
CASH, HR ;
GROTZ, RC .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1970, 10 (01) :20-&
[9]
ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002 [J].
Kondrup, J ;
Allison, SP ;
Elia, M ;
Vellas, B ;
Plauth, M .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2003, 22 (04) :415-421
[10]
RUBENSTEIN L Z, 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, V39, p8S