Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program

被引:183
作者
Defazio, Daniela [2 ]
Lockett, Andy
Wright, Mike [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Ctr Management Buy Out Res, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] Univ Ottawa, Telfer Sch Management, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Research productivity; Collaboration; EU-funded networks; REWARD SYSTEM; PATTERNS; UNIVERSITIES; AUTHORSHIP; TRENDS; IMPACT; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we examine how incentives for collaboration shape collaborative behavior and researcher productivity in the context of EU-funded research networks. EU-fundecl research networks require researchers to collaborate as a condition for securing research funding. The presence of research funding, therefore, may influence collaborative behavior. Our approach involves isolating the effects of funding, collaboration and previous collaborations (prior to funding) on research output, and examining how the pattern of collaboration affects research productivity over time. Employing a panel of 294 researchers in 39 EU research networks over a 15-year period we find that while the impact of funding on productivity is generally positive the overall impact of collaboration within the funded networks is weak. When we delineate between pre-, during- and post-funding periods, however, we find some important differences. During the period of funding, collaboration did not lead to an increase in research production. In the post-funding period we find that although the number of collaborations decreases within the network, the impact of collaboration on productivity is positive and significant. Our findings suggest that collaborations formed to capitalize on funding opportunities, while not effective in enhancing researcher productivity in the short run, may be an important promoter of effective collaborations in the longer run. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All Fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 305
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981-1999 [J].
Adams, JD ;
Black, GC ;
Clemmons, JR ;
Stephan, PE .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :259-285
[2]   PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENCES AMONG SCIENTISTS - EVIDENCE FOR ACCUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
STEWART, JA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 39 (04) :596-606
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Social Stratification in Science
[4]  
ARORA A, 1996, IDEAS WORKING PAPERS
[5]  
ARORA A, 1998, ANN EC STAT
[6]  
Baltagi B.H., 2002, ECONOMETRIC ANAL PAN
[7]   STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .2. SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY AND VISIBILITY IN THE FRENCH SCIENTIFIC ELITE, 1799-1830 [J].
BEAVER, DD ;
ROSEN, R .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1979, 1 (02) :133-149
[8]   CHEMISTS IN BRITISH UNIVERSITIES - STUDY OF REWARD SYSTEM IN SCIENCE [J].
BLUME, SS ;
SINCLAIR, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1973, 38 (01) :126-138
[9]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[10]   THE SCIENTOMETRIC WEIGHT OF 50 NATIONS IN 27 SCIENCE AREAS, 1989-1993 .1. ALL FIELDS COMBINED, MATHEMATICS, ENGINEERING, CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS [J].
BRAUN, T ;
GLANZEL, W ;
GRUPP, H .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1995, 33 (03) :263-293