The Use of Reference Values in Indicator-Based Methods for the Environmental Assessment of Agricultural Systems

被引:42
作者
Acosta-Alba, Ivonne [1 ,2 ]
van der Werf, Hayo M. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR1069, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Agrocampus Ouest, Soil Agro & HydroSyst, UMR1069, F-35000 Rennes, France
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2011年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
reference value; threshold; fair earthshare; critical flow; sustainability standard; critical threshold values; baseline value; environmental minimum requirement;
D O I
10.3390/su3020424
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many indicator-based methods for the environmental assessment of farming systems have been developed. It is not the absolute values of the indicators that reveal whether the impact of a system is acceptable, but rather the distance between these values and some reference values. We reviewed eight frameworks for the environmental assessment of agricultural systems that define reference values for their indicators. We analyzed the methods used to establish reference values and explored how to improve these methods to increase their usage and relevance. This analysis revealed a striking diversity of terminology, sources, and modes of expression of results. Normative reference values allow the assessment of a single system with a previously defined value; Relative reference values are based on indicator values for similar systems or a reference system. Normative reference values can be Science-based or Policy-based. A science-based normative reference value can be a Target value, which identifies desirable conditions, or an Environmental limit, which is the level beyond which conditions are unacceptable. The quantification of the uncertainty of reference values is a topic which is barely explored and warrants further research. Reference values present a means of introducing site specificity into methods for environmental assessment which seems, at present, largely under-exploited.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 442
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Bare J., 2000, INT WORKSH LIF CYCL
  • [2] Determining environmental minimum requirements for functions provided by agro-ecosystems
    Bastian, Olaf
    Corti, Claudia
    Lebboroni, Marco
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 27 (04) : 279 - 291
  • [3] Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture
    Binder, Claudia R.
    Feola, Giuseppe
    Steinberger, Julia K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) : 71 - 81
  • [4] Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Guichard, Laurence
    Makowski, David
    Aveline, Anne
    Girardin, Philippe
    Plantureux, Sylvain
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (01) : 139 - 149
  • [5] Braunschweig A., 1993, OEKOBILANZEN UNTERNE
  • [6] Braunschweig A., 1998, METHODE OKOFAKTOREN
  • [7] Brunett Perez L., 2005, LIVEST RES RURAL DEV, V17
  • [8] Estimating sustainability gaps: methods and preliminary applications for the UK and the Netherlands
    Ekins, P
    Simon, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [9] Mind the sustainability gap
    Fischer, Joern
    Manning, Adrian D.
    Steffen, Will
    Rose, Deborah B.
    Daniell, Katherine
    Felton, Adam
    Garnett, Stephen
    Gilna, Ben
    Heinsohn, Rob
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    MacDonald, Ben
    Mills, Frank
    Newell, Barry
    Reid, Julian
    Robin, Libby
    Sherren, Kate
    Wade, Alan
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (12) : 621 - 624
  • [10] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1976, A framework for land evaluation