A validation study of 3 grading systems to evaluate small-bowel cleansing for wireless capsule endoscopy: a quantitative index, a qualitative evaluation, and an overall adequacy assessment

被引:91
作者
Brotz, Corey [1 ]
Nandi, Neilanjan [2 ]
Conn, Mitchell [1 ]
Daskalakis, Constantine [3 ]
DiMarino, Michael [1 ]
Infantolino, Anthony [1 ]
Katz, Leo C. [1 ]
Schroeder, Theodore [4 ]
Kastenberg, David
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
TRANSIT-TIME; COLONOSCOPY; SIMETHICONE; INDICATORS; IMPACT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a powerful tool for evaluating the small bowel. Assessment of small-bowel cleansing for CE is an essential quality measure. Objective: Our purpose was to validate 3 new scales that grade small-bowel cleansing for CE. Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Intervention: Five experienced capsule endoscopists read 40 CEs twice, separated by I month, to grade small-bowel cleansing on 3 scales-quantitative index (QI; 0-10), qualitative evaluation (QE; poor, fair, good, excellent), and overall adequacy assessment (OAA; inadequate, adequate). The QI and QE evaluated both the entire and distal small bowel. Investigators received no prior training in these scales. Main Outcome Measurements: Intraclass correlation coefficients to assess intraobserver (test-retest) and interobserver reliability. Patients: Forty patients who underwent I CE between June 2005 and May 2006 and who satisfied entry criteria. Results: Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial for the QI (0.60-0.66), moderate for the OAA (0.56), and fair to moderate for the QE (0.37-0.47). Interobserver scores were lower QI and OAA moderate (0.47-0-52, 0.41, respectively) and slight to fair for the QE (0.20-0.24). QI scores for the entire and distal small bowel were highly correlated for each reader (0.57-0.87), and distal small-bowel scores were lower by 1.3 points, indicating poorer cleansing (P = .001). A dichotomized QE of excellent/good versus fair/poor had moderate to Substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability (0.58-0.66, 0.41-0.49, respectively). There was a strong and highly significant association among all 3 scales (P < .001 between QI and both QE and OAA). Conclusion: We have described and validated 3 scales for grading small-bowel cleansing for CE. An evaluation of small-bowel cleansing should be routinely incorporated into the CE report. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:262-70.)
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Simethicone for small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy:: A systematic, single-blinded, controlled study [J].
Albert, J ;
Göbel, CM ;
Lesske, J ;
Lotterer, E ;
Nietsch, H ;
Fleig, WE .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (04) :487-491
[2]  
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[3]   Comparison of the interobserver reproducibility with different histologic criteria used in celiac disease [J].
Corazza, Gino Roberto ;
Villanacci, Vincenzo ;
Zambelli, Claudia ;
Milione, Massimo ;
Luinetti, Ombretta ;
Vindigni, Carla ;
Chioda, Caterina ;
Albarello, Luca ;
Bartolini, Daniela ;
Donato, Francesco .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (07) :838-843
[4]  
CORON E, 2004, IS PREPARATION REQUI
[5]   Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel (PillCam SB) [J].
Eliakim, AR .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 22 (02) :124-127
[6]   Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: An introduction [J].
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM ;
Baron, TH ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffman, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Mergener, K ;
Petersen, BT ;
Petrini, JL ;
Rex, DK ;
Safdi, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) :866-872
[7]  
Fireman Z, 2004, ISRAEL MED ASSOC J, V6, P521
[8]   TIMI frame count: A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow [J].
Gibson, CM ;
Cannon, CP ;
Daley, WL ;
Dodge, JT ;
Alexander, B ;
Marble, SJ ;
McCabe, CH ;
Raymond, L ;
Fortin, T ;
Poole, WK ;
Braunwald, E .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 93 (05) :879-888
[9]  
*GIV IM, DOES PAT PREP PILLCA
[10]  
*GIV IM, 2006 ANN REP GIV IM