Energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation potential of the Turkish iron and steel industry using the LEAP (long-range energy alternatives planning) system

被引:91
作者
Ates, Seyithan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[2] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Sch Business & Management Sci, TR-34810 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Energy management; Energy efficiency; LEAP modeling; GHG (greenhouse gas) emission; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; EMISSIONS; OPPORTUNITIES; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.059
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
With the assistance of the LEAP (long-range energy alternatives planning) energy modeling tool, this study explores the energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction potential of the iron and steel industry in Turkey. With a share of 35%, the steel and iron industry is considered as the most energy-consuming sector in Turkey. The study explores that the energy intensity rate can be lowered by 13%, 38% and 51% in SEI (slow-speed energy efficiency improvement), AEI (accelerating energy efficiency improvement) and CPT (cleaner production and technology scenario) scenarios, respectively. Particularly the projected aggregated energy savings of the scenarios CPT and AES are very promising with saving rates of 33.7% and 23% respectively. Compared to baseline scenarios, energy efficiency improvements correspond to economic potential of 0.1 billion dollars for SEI, 1.25 dollars for AEI and 1.8 billion dollars for CPT scenarios annually. Concerning GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions, in 2030 the iron and steel industry in Turkey is estimated to produce 34.9 MtCO(2) in BAU (business-as-usual scenario), 32.5 MtCO(2) in SEI, 24.6 MtCO(2) in AEI and 14.5 MtCO(2) in CPT a scenario which corresponds to savings of 9%-39%. The study reveals that energy consumption and GHG emissions of the iron and steel industry can be lowered significantly if the necessary measures are implemented. It is expected that this study will fill knowledge gaps pertaining to energy efficiency potential in Turkish energy intensive industries and help stake-holders in energy intensive industries to realize the potential for energy efficiency and GHG mitigation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 428
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector [J].
Abdelaziz, E. A. ;
Saidur, R. ;
Mekhilef, S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (01) :150-168
[2]   CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A decomposition analysis [J].
Akbostanci, Elif ;
Tunc, Gul Ipek ;
Turut-Asik, Serap .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (06) :2273-2278
[3]   Evaluation of corporate energy management practices of energy intensive industries in Turkey [J].
Ates, Seyithan Ahmet ;
Durakbasa, Numan M. .
ENERGY, 2012, 45 (01) :81-91
[4]   Disposal of solid waste in Istanbul and along the Black Sea coast of Turkey [J].
Berkun, M ;
Aras, E ;
Nemlioglu, S .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (08) :847-855
[5]  
Caffal C., 1995, Energy Management in Industry
[6]   Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China's five sectors in 2020 [J].
Cai, Wenjia ;
Wang, Can ;
Chen, Jining ;
Wang, Ke ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Lu, Xuedu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (03) :1181-1194
[7]  
Chontanawat J, ENERGY
[8]  
Cimen S, 2008, TURK IKL DEG ANK TUR
[9]   Industrial electricity demand for Turkey: A structural time series analysis [J].
Dilaver, Zafer ;
Hunt, Lester C. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (03) :426-436
[10]  
Heaps C., 2002, INTEGRATED ENERGY EN