The fight for 'how to think': Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation

被引:52
作者
Meraz, Sharon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Commun, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
agenda setting; attribute agenda setting; citizen media; networked politics; political blogosphere; political blogs; social influence; social media; social networks; two-step flow; AGENDA-SETTING FUNCTION; INTERPERSONAL-COMMUNICATION; COVERAGE; NEWS; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; CHOICE; PRESS; FLOW; BLOG;
D O I
10.1177/1464884910385193
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study tested social influence theories against traditional media attribute agenda setting theory within 18 ideologically diverse political blogs, two elite traditional media entities, and the latter's 11 political newsroom blogs across three issues in 2007. Results reveal significant correlations in left-leaning network agendas ranging from 0.64 to 0.91 through all issue periods. Social influence did not homogenize interpretative agendas within the right-leaning network through two of the three issue periods. As predicted, partisan blog networks showed insignificant correlations in attribute agendas, and unlike the left-leaning and moderate blog networks, the right-leaning blog network bore little similarity to traditional media's issue interpretation across two of the three issues. These findings point to two significant trends: the growing power of social influence among partisan blog networks and the weakening influence of elite, traditional media as a singular power in influencing issue interpretation within networked political environments.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 127
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Adamic LGlance., 2005, The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog
[2]  
[Anonymous], C P MEYER U N CAR CH
[3]  
[Anonymous], BLOG MASS MOV GRASSR
[4]  
[Anonymous], WHAT I LEARNED BLOGG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973 INT COMM ASS MO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006 ANN M INT UNPUB
[7]  
[Anonymous], ANN CONV ASS ED JOUR
[8]  
[Anonymous], CHRONICLE REV
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1922, PUBLIC OPINION
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LONG TAIL WHY FUTURE