Structural effect of avocado/soybean unsaponifiables on joint space loss in osteoarthritis of the hip

被引:83
作者
Lequesne, M
Maheu, E
Cadet, C
Dreiser, RL
机构
[1] Hop Leopold Bellan, Paris, France
[2] Hop Cochin, F-75674 Paris, France
[3] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, F-75877 Paris, France
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2002年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
avocado/soybean unsaponiflables; structural effect; hip osteoarthritis; randomized; controlled trial;
D O I
10.1002/art1.10239
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the structural effect of avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) in the treatment of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Methods. Patients with regular painful primary OA of the hip (European League Against Rheumatism 1980 criteria) and a joint space still greater than or equal to 1 mm (Kellgren grade 1 to 3, assessed by an independent observer prior to inclusion) entered a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 2 years duration. Patients had at least a 6-month history of regular pain and an algofunctional index (AFI) greater than or equal to 4. The primary assessment criterion was a decrease of the joint space width (JSW) on plain anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis performed in standing position, measured at the narrowest points by 2 independent readers, previously tested and selected and blinded to both the treatment and the time sequence. Secondary criteria were standard clinical outcome measurements (AFI, pain on a visual analog scale, consumption of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and patient's and investigator's global assessments). Results. One hundred sixty-three patients were included: 102 men and 61 women (mean age 63.2 +/- 8.7 years). A total of 108 patients (72 men and 36 women; mean age 64 +/- 7.9 years) were radiologically evaluable at 23.7 +/- 2.6 months (ASU group; n = 55) and 23.7 +/- 3.2 months (placebo group; n 53). Overall comparison of the evolution of JSW showed no difference between the ASU and placebo groups, from 2.35 +/- 0.93 to 1.87 +/- 1.10 mm and from 2.5 +/- 0.94 to 1.9 +/- 1.33 mm, respectively (intergroup P value at end point = 0.9). When patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the median value of the baseline JSW (2.45 mm), the joint space loss in the most severely affected subgroup of patients (baseline JSW less than or equal to median) was significantly greater in the placebo group than in the ASU group: from 1.69 +/- 0.58 to 0.84 +/- 0.77 mm (-0.86 +/- 0.62 mm) and from 1.66 +/- 0.42 to 1.22 +/- 0.7 mm (-0.43 +/- 0.51 mm), respectively (P < 0.01). The JSW decrease was identical, with no difference in ASU and placebo groups, in the less severely affected subgroup of patients (baseline ISW > median). Clinical parameters in the 2 groups did not differ significantly throughout the study. Conclusion. This pilot randomized. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial failed to demonstrate a structural effect of ASU in hip OA. However, in a post-hoc analysis, ASU significantly reduced the progression of joint space loss as compared with placebo in the subgroup of patients with advanced joint space narrowing. These results suggest that ASU could have a structural effect but require confirmation in a larger placebo-controlled study in hip OA.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 58
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society - Results from a workshop [J].
Altman, R ;
Brandt, K ;
Hochberg, M ;
MOskowitz, R ;
Bellamy, N ;
Bloch, DA ;
Buckwalter, J ;
Dougados, M ;
Ehrlich, G ;
Lequesne, M ;
Lohmander, S ;
Murphy, WA ;
RosarioJansen, T ;
Schwartz, B ;
Trippel, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1996, 4 (04) :217-243
[2]   RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESSION IN OSTEOARTHRITIS [J].
ALTMAN, RD ;
FRIES, JF ;
BLOCH, DA ;
CARSTENS, J ;
COOKE, D ;
GENANT, H ;
GOFTON, P ;
GROTH, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MURPHY, WA ;
SHARP, JT ;
SPITZ, P ;
WILLIAMS, CA ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1987, 30 (11) :1214-1225
[3]  
ARMBUSTER TG, 1978, RADIOLOGY, V128, P1
[4]   Radiographic assessment of hip osteoarthritis progression: impact of reading procedures for longitudinal studies [J].
Auleley, GR ;
Giraudeau, B ;
Dougados, M ;
Ravaud, P .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2000, 59 (06) :422-427
[5]  
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[6]  
Blotman F, 1997, REV RHUM, V64, P825
[7]  
Boumediene K, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V42, P148, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199901)42:1<148::AID-ANR18>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-U
[9]  
BOUVENOT G, 1994, REV RHUM, V61, P74
[10]   Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: comparison between existing methodologies [J].
Buckland-Wright, C .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1999, 7 (04) :430-433