The REMATCH trial: Rationale, design, and end points

被引:245
作者
Rose, EA
Moskowitz, AJ
Packer, M
Sollano, JA
Williams, DL
Tierney, AR
Heitjan, DF
Meier, P
Ascheim, DD
Levitan, RG
Weinberg, AD
Stevenson, LW
Shapiro, PA
Lazar, RM
Watson, JT
Goldstein, DJ
Gelijns, AC
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Int Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Innovat Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Neurol, New York, NY USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[7] New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[9] NHLBI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00042-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Because left ventricular assist devices have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to support the circulation of patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation, these devices are increasingly being considered as a potential alternative to biologic cardiac replacement. The Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial is a multicenter study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to compare long-term implantation of left ventricular assist devices with optimal medical management for patients with end-stage heart failure who require, but do not qualify to receive cardiac transplantation. Methods. We discuss the rationale for conducting REMATCH, the obstacles to designing this and other randomized surgical trials, the lessons learned in conducting the multicenter pilot study, and the features of the REMATCH study design (objectives, target population, treatments, end points, analysis, and trial organization). Conclusions. We consider what will be learned from REMATCH, expectations for expanding the use of left ventricular assist devices, and future directions for assessing clinical procedures. (Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:723-30) (C) 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 730
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Clinical trials: a practical approach
  • [2] The six-minute walk test predicts peak oxygen uptake and survival in patients with advanced heart failure
    Cahalin, LP
    Mathier, MA
    Semigran, MJ
    Dec, GW
    DiSalvo, TG
    [J]. CHEST, 1996, 110 (02) : 325 - 332
  • [3] Outpatient left ventricular assist device support: A destination rather than a bridge
    Catanese, KA
    Goldstein, DJ
    Williams, DL
    Foray, AT
    Illick, CD
    Gardocki, MT
    Weinberg, AD
    Levin, HR
    Rose, EA
    Oz, MC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (03) : 646 - 652
  • [4] FARRAR DJ, 1994, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V13, P1125
  • [5] Foray A, 1996, CIRCULATION, V94, P222
  • [6] MULTICENTER CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE HEARTMATE 1000-IP LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    FRAZIER, OH
    ROSE, EA
    MACMANUS, Q
    BURTON, NA
    LEFRAK, EA
    POIRIER, VL
    DASSE, KA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 53 (06) : 1080 - 1090
  • [7] FUNK M, 1991, ARTIFICIAL HEART PRO, P251
  • [8] Evolving costs of long-term left ventricular assist device implantation
    Gelijns, AC
    Richards, AF
    Williams, DL
    Oz, MC
    Oliveira, J
    Moskowitz, AJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (05) : 1312 - 1319
  • [9] COMPARISON OF CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY AND MEDICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER - A NONRANDOMIZED STUDY FROM THE CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY STUDY (CASS) REGISTRY
    GERSH, BJ
    KRONMAL, RA
    SCHAFF, HV
    FRYE, RL
    RYAN, TJ
    MOCK, MB
    MYERS, WO
    ATHEARN, MW
    GOSSELIN, AJ
    KAISER, GC
    BOURASSA, MG
    KILLIP, T
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (04) : 217 - 224
  • [10] GRAGE TB, 1980, UICC TECH REP SER, V70, P23