Drug treatment of atrial fibrillation: What have we learned?

被引:15
作者
Hohnloser, SH
Li, YG
机构
[1] J.W. Goethe University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, 60590, Frankfurt
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001573-199701000-00005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pharmacologic treatment continues to be the mainstay of therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Over the past few years, considerable progress has been made in establishing the role of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for restoration and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm as well as for the control of ventricular rate in permanent AF. For pharmacologic cardioversion, intravenous or oral administration of class IC drugs is associated with success rates of 60% to 80% depending mainly on the duration of the arrhythmia. In persistent AF of longer than 1 week's duration, electrical cardioversion is recommended because this method is more effective and safer than drug therapy. For maintenance of sinus rhythm following successful cardioversion, class I drugs continue to be used often. However, there is increasing awareness of their proarrhythmic risk, particularly in the case of quinidine. Sotalol, a class III agent with beta-receptor antagonism, is as effective as quinidine but better tolerated. in patients with so-called refractory AF, amiodarone has been proven to be effective in approximately 60% to 70% of treatment attempts. For control of ventricular rate, digoxin, beta-blockers, and calcium-channel antagonists are widely used. In these patients, chronic anticoagulation with warfarin aiming at international normalized ratios between 2.0 and 3.5 has been documented to significantly reduce thromboembolic risk. (C) 1997 Rapid Science Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 32
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   SUPPRESSION OF TIME-DEPENDENT OUTWARD CURRENT IN GUINEA-PIG VENTRICULAR MYOCYTES - ACTIONS OF QUINIDINE AND AMIODARONE [J].
BALSER, JR ;
BENNETT, PB ;
HONDEGHEM, LM ;
RODEN, DM .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1991, 69 (02) :519-529
[2]  
BELLANDI F, 1995, CIRCULATION, P1154
[3]   AMIODARONE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION [J].
BLEVINS, RD ;
KERIN, NZ ;
BENADERET, D ;
FRUMIN, H ;
FAITEL, K ;
JARANDILLA, R ;
RUBENFIRE, M .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 147 (08) :1401-1404
[4]   BRADYCARDIA-DEPENDENT TRIGGERED ACTIVITY - RELEVANCE TO DRUG-INDUCED MULTIFORM VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA [J].
BRACHMANN, J ;
SCHERLAG, BJ ;
ROSENSHTRAUKH, LV ;
LAZZARA, R .
CIRCULATION, 1983, 68 (04) :846-856
[5]   Control of rapid heart rate in patients with atrial fibrillation: Drugs or ablation? [J].
Brignole, M ;
Menozzi, C .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (03) :348-356
[6]   COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF THE COMBINATION OF DIGOXIN AND DL-SOTALOL THERAPY VERSUS DIGOXIN MONOTHERAPY FOR CONTROL OF VENTRICULAR RESPONSE IN CHRONIC ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION [J].
BRODSKY, M ;
SAINI, R ;
BELLINGER, R ;
ZOBLE, R ;
WEISS, R ;
POWERS, L .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 127 (03) :572-577
[7]   AMIODARONE FOR MAINTENANCE OF SINUS RHYTHM AFTER CONVERSION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION IN THE SETTING OF A DILATED LEFT ATRIUM [J].
BRODSKY, MA ;
ALLEN, BJ ;
WALKER, CJ ;
CASEY, TP ;
LUCKETT, CR ;
HENRY, WL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (07) :572-575
[8]   Safety of long-term flecainide and propafenone in the management of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Report from the flecainide and propafenone Italian study investigators [J].
Chimienti, M ;
Cullen, MT ;
Casadei, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (03) :A60-A65
[9]   LONG-TERM EFFICACY OF AMIODARONE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF NORMAL SINUS RHYTHM IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION OR FLUTTER [J].
CHUN, SH ;
SAGER, PT ;
STEVENSON, WG ;
NADEMANEE, K ;
MIDDLEKAUFF, HR ;
SINGH, BN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 76 (01) :47-50
[10]  
COBBE SM, 1995, CIRCULATION, V92, P2550