Microarray segmentation methods significantly influence data precision

被引:48
作者
Ahmed, AA [1 ]
Vias, M [1 ]
Iyer, NG [1 ]
Caldas, C [1 ]
Brenton, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Hutchison MRC Res Ctr, Dept Oncol, Canc Genom Program, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/gnh047
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Little consideration has been given to the effect of different segmentation methods on the variability of data derived from microarray images. Previous work has suggested that the significant source of variability from microarray image analysis is from estimation of local background. In this study, we used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models to investigate the effect of methods of segmentation on the precision of measurements obtained from replicate microarray experiments. We used four different methods of spot segmentation (adaptive, fixed circle, histogram and GenePix) to analyse a total number of 156 172 spots from 12 microarray experiments. Using a two-way ANOVA model and the coefficient of repeatability, we show that the method of segmentation significantly affects the precision of the microarray data. The histogram method gave the lowest variability across replicate spots compared to other methods, and had the lowest pixel-to-pixel variability within spots. This effect on precision was independent of background subtraction. We show that these findings have direct, practical implications as the variability in precision between the four methods resulted in different numbers of genes being identified as differentially expressed. Segmentation method is an important source of variability in microarray data that directly affects precision and the identification of differentially expressed genes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) - toward standards for microarray data [J].
Brazma, A ;
Hingamp, P ;
Quackenbush, J ;
Sherlock, G ;
Spellman, P ;
Stoeckert, C ;
Aach, J ;
Ansorge, W ;
Ball, CA ;
Causton, HC ;
Gaasterland, T ;
Glenisson, P ;
Holstege, FCP ;
Kim, IF ;
Markowitz, V ;
Matese, JC ;
Parkinson, H ;
Robinson, A ;
Sarkans, U ;
Schulze-Kremer, S ;
Stewart, J ;
Taylor, R ;
Vilo, J ;
Vingron, M .
NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 29 (04) :365-371
[3]   Image metrics in the statistical analysis of DNA microarray data [J].
Brown, CS ;
Goodwin, PC ;
Sorger, PK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (16) :8944-8949
[4]   Questions and answers on design of dual-label microarrays for identifying differentially expressed genes [J].
Dobbin, K ;
Shih, JH ;
Simon, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (18) :1362-1369
[5]  
Dudoit S, 2002, STAT SINICA, V12, P111
[6]   Obtaining reliable information from minute amounts of RNA using cDNA microarrays [J].
Hu, LM ;
Wang, J ;
Baggerly, K ;
Wang, H ;
Fuller, GN ;
Hamilton, SR ;
Coombes, KR ;
Zhang, W .
BMC GENOMICS, 2002, 3 (1)
[7]   Expression profiling using microarrays fabricated by an ink-jet oligonucleotide synthesizer [J].
Hughes, TR ;
Mao, M ;
Jones, AR ;
Burchard, J ;
Marton, MJ ;
Shannon, KW ;
Lefkowitz, SM ;
Ziman, M ;
Schelter, JM ;
Meyer, MR ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Davis, C ;
Dai, HY ;
He, YDD ;
Stephaniants, SB ;
Cavet, G ;
Walker, WL ;
West, A ;
Coffey, E ;
Shoemaker, DD ;
Stoughton, R ;
Blanchard, AP ;
Friend, SH ;
Linsley, PS .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :342-347
[8]  
Ihaka R., 1996, J COMPUTATIONAL GRAP, V5, P299, DOI [10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, 10.2307/1390807, DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713]
[9]   Analysis of repeatability in spotted cDNA microarrays [J].
Jenssen, TK ;
Langaas, M ;
Kuo, WP ;
Smith-Sorensen, B ;
Myklebost, O ;
Hovig, E .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2002, 30 (14) :3235-3244
[10]   Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations [J].
Lee, MLT ;
Kuo, FC ;
Whitmore, GA ;
Sklar, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (18) :9834-9839