Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: The role of values and institutions

被引:106
作者
Wade-Benzoni, KA
Hoffman, AJ
Thompson, LL
Moore, DA
Gillespie, JJ
Bazerman, MH
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, JL Kellogg Grad Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Grad Sch Ind Adm, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/4134368
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although traditional behavioral decision theory as applied to negotiation sheds light on some of the barriers encountered in negotiations, it does not fully account for many of the difficulties and failures to reach settlement in ideologically based disputes. In this article we identify a number of factors that differentiate ideologically based negotiations from other types of negotiations and advance a perspective that takes into account the value-laden and institutional contexts in which they occur. We illustrate our ideas by applying them to the organizationally relevant example of environmental disputes.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 57
页数:17
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Allison S. T., 1990, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V3, P195, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960030304
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENV LAW POLICY NATUR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Free Market Environmentalism
[5]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL DILEMMAS THEO
[6]  
ARNST C, 1997, BUS WEEK 1110, P98
[7]   Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases [J].
Babcock, L ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (01) :109-126
[8]  
Babcock L, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1337
[9]   REFERENCE POINTS AND OMISSION BIAS [J].
BARON, J ;
RITOV, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 59 (03) :475-498
[10]  
BARON J, 1996, ETHICAL ISSUES MANAG, P197