Minimising soil disturbance and reaction forces for high speed sowing using bentleg furrow openers

被引:39
作者
Barr, James B. [1 ]
Desbiolles, Jack M. A. [1 ]
Fielke, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Engn, Agr Machinery Res & Design Ctr, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
关键词
Soil throw; No-till seeding; Furrow opener; Bentleg; Draft force; Furrow backfill; NARROW OPENERS; TRANSLOCATION; WHEAT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.08.025
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
082806 [农业信息与电气工程];
摘要
Australian no-till farmers often use narrow point openers to create furrows for seed and fertilizer placement. However, operational speeds are limited due to excessive lateral soil throw reducing furrow backfill and causing interactions between adjacent furrows. This study measured the effects of speed (8, 12 and 16 km h(-1)) on soil disturbance and tillage forces for five different openers, aiming to evaluate suitable options for high speed seeding. Three straight shank openers, 90 (blunt and chamfered face) and 53 rake angles were compared to two bentleg geometries (45 and 95 mm offsets), in a dry silt-loam field soil. The 53 straight opener showed the largest response to speed, reducing furrow backfill and increasing lateral soil throw (from furrow center). The addition of a double sided chamfer reduced lateral soil throw and maintained 100% backfill at 8 km h(-1) but soil disturbance increased at 12 and 16 km h(-1). Both bentleg openers maintained 100% backfill and operated with a lateral soil throw less than half the straight openers at 8 km h(-1) However, the 45 mm offset bentleg opener had more soil throw at speed. This resulted in reduced furrow backfill and increased lateral soil throw at 16 km h(-1) (reaching similar to the straight shank openers). The 95 mm offset bentleg was able to maintain its low soil disturbance characteristics at speeds up to 16 km h(-1) The findings show potential for new opener technology to increase operating speeds of no-till seeding operations by minimising soil disturbance and draft, therefore improving work-rate and timeliness of sowing. (C) 2016 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Ashworth M., 2010, Disc seeding in zero-till farming systems: a review of technology and paddock issues
[2]
Baker C.J., 2006, No-Tillage Seeding in Conservation Agriculture, V2nd
[3]
Burce M.E.C., 2013, EAEF, V1, P1
[4]
Seeding Performances of No-Till Seeders Equipped with Different Furrow Openers, Covering Components and Forward Speeds for Winter Wheat [J].
Celik, Ahmet ;
Altikat, Sefa .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 18 (03) :226-238
[5]
Chen Y, 2004, SOIL TILL RES, V77, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2003.12.001
[6]
Why do we need to standardize no-tillage research? [J].
Derpsch, R. ;
Franzluebbers, A. J. ;
Duiker, S. W. ;
Reicosky, D. C. ;
Koeller, K. ;
Friedrich, T. ;
Sturny, W. G. ;
Sa, J. C. M. ;
Weiss, K. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2014, 137 :16-22
[7]
Desbiolles J. M. A., 2007, FURROW LOOSENI UNPUB
[8]
Desbiolles J.M.A., 2003, P 16 TRIENN INT SOIL
[9]
Desbiolles J. M. A., 2008, POINTS DIFFERENCE CO
[10]
Desbiolles JMA, 2006, 17 TRIENN C INT SOIL