Estimating the frequency of extreme rainfall using weather radar and stochastic storm transposition

被引:84
作者
Wright, Daniel B. [1 ]
Smith, James A. [1 ]
Villarini, Gabriele [2 ]
Baeck, Mary Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Extreme events; Extreme rainfall; Rainfall frequency analysis; Flood frequency analysis; Radar rainfall; APPALACHIAN LEE TROUGHS; RANGE-DEPENDENT ERROR; MEAN-FIELD BIAS; VERTICAL PROFILE; EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITIES; LIGHTNING DATA; FLASH FLOODS; PRECIPITATION; WSR-88D; HYDROLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatial and temporal variability in extreme rainfall, and its interactions with land cover and the drainage network, is an important driver of flood response. "Design storms," which are commonly used for flood risk assessment, however, are assumed to be uniform in space and either uniform or highly idealized in time. The impacts of these and other commonly-made assumptions are rarely considered, and their impacts on flood risk estimates are poorly understood. This study presents an alternate framework for rainfall frequency analysis that couples stochastic storm transposition (SST) with "storm catalogs" developed from a ten-year high-resolution (15-min, 1-km(2)) radar rainfall dataset for the region surrounding Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. The SST procedure involves spatial and temporal resampling from these storm catalogs to reconstruct the regional climatology of extreme rainfall. SST-based intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) estimates are driven by the spatial and temporal rainfall variability from weather radar observations, are tailored specifically to the chosen watershed, and do not require simplifying assumptions of storm structure. We are able to use the SST procedure to reproduce IDE estimates from conventional methods for four urban watersheds in Charlotte. We demonstrate that extreme rainfall can vary substantially in time and in space, with potentially important flood risk implications that cannot be assessed using conventional techniques. SST coupled with high-resolution radar rainfall fields represents a useful alternative to conventional design storms for flood risk assessment, the full advantages of which can be realized when the concept is extended to flood frequency analysis using a distributed hydrologic model. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 165
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Alexander G.N., 1963, Journal of Hydrology, V1, P46, DOI [10.1016/0022-1694(63)90032-5, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(63)90032-5]
  • [2] ANDRIEU H, 1995, J APPL METEOROL, V34, P225, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0225:IOVPOR>2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Precipitation areal-reduction factor estimation using an annual-maxima centered approach
    Asquith, WH
    Famiglietti, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 230 (1-2) : 55 - 69
  • [5] Baeck ML, 1998, WEATHER FORECAST, V13, P416, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0416:REBTWF>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Real-time comparisons of VPR-corrected daily rainfall estimates with a gauge mesonet
    Bellon, Aldo
    Lee, Gyuwon
    Kilambi, Alamelu
    Zawadzki, Isztar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (06) : 726 - 741
  • [8] Berne A, 2004, J HYDROMETEOROL, V5, P296, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0296:IOTVPO>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Temporal and spatial resolution of rainfall measurements required for urban hydrology
    Berne, A
    Delrieu, G
    Creutin, JD
    Obled, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 299 (3-4) : 166 - 179