Resilience Markers for Safer Systems and Organisations

被引:13
作者
Back, Jonathan [1 ]
Furniss, Dominic [1 ,2 ]
Hilderbrandt, Michael
Blandford, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Interact Ctr, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] OECD Halden Reactor Project, Ind Psychol Div, London, England
来源
COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS | 2008年 / 5219卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Human error; distributed cognition; control rooms; nuclear domain;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-540-87698-4_11
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
If computer systems are to be designed to foster resilient performance it is important to be able to identify contributors to resilience. The emerging practice of Resilience Engineering has identified that people are still a primary source of resilience. and that the design of distributed systems should provide ways of helping people and organisations to cope with complexity. A]though resilience has been identified as a desired property, researchers and practitioners do not have a clear understanding of what manifestations of resilience look like. This paper discusses some examples of strategies that people can adopt that improve the resilience of it system. Critically, analysis reveals that the generation of these strategies is only possible if the system facilitates them. As an example. this paper discusses practices, Such its reflection, that are known to encourage resilient behavior in people. Reflection allows systems to better prepare for on coming demands. We show that contributors to the practice of reflection manifest themselves at different levels of abstraction: from individual strategies to practices in, for example, control room environments. The analysis of interaction at these levels enables resilient properties of a system to be 'seen', so that systems can be designed to explicitly support them. We then present in analysis of resilience at an organisational level within the nuclear domain. This highlights some of the challenges facing the Resilience Engineering approach and the need for using I collective language to articulate knowledge of resilient practices across domains.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BACK J, 2007, P RES WORKSH LINK U, P1
[2]  
BACK J, 2008, AVOIDING SL IN PRESS
[3]   Does being motivated to avoid procedural errors influence their systematicity? [J].
Back, Jonathan ;
Lok Cheng, Wai ;
Dann, Rob ;
Curzon, Paul ;
Blandford, Ann .
PEOPLE AND COMPUTERS XX - ENGAGE, 2007, :151-+
[4]   Temporal coordination - on time and coordination of collaborative activities at a surgical department [J].
Bardram J.E. .
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2000, 9 (2) :157-187
[5]  
Blandford A, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3941, P26
[6]   A working memory model of a common procedural error [J].
Byrne, MD ;
Bovair, S .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1997, 21 (01) :31-61
[7]  
Cook RI, 1994, HUMAN ERROR MED, P255, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203751725-13
[8]   Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety [J].
Dekker, S .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2003, 34 (03) :233-238
[9]   The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective [J].
Ertmer, PA ;
Newby, TJ .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1996, 24 (01) :1-24
[10]   Understanding emergency medical dispatch in terms of distributed cognition: a case study [J].
Furniss, Dominic ;
Blandford, Ann .
ERGONOMICS, 2006, 49 (12-13) :1174-1203