Using Visual Representations as Boundary Objects to Resolve Conflict in Collaborative Model-Building Approaches

被引:87
作者
Black, Laura J. [1 ]
Andersen, David F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Coll Business, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Rockefeller Coll Publ Affairs & Policy, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
boundary objects; collaboration; group model building; problem solving; system dynamics; DILEMMAS;
D O I
10.1002/sres.2106
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the context of facilitated, technology-supported efforts to resolve complex problems, we recognize the critical role that visual representations can play in both the content and process of collaboration. How these representations are wielded by facilitators and interpreted by participants determines whether they help resolve conflicts or close down conversations. We identify three key attributes of scripted problem-solving facilitation, as well as three key attributes of visual representations that function as boundary objects, to gain insights into pivotal experiences when group problem-solving efforts turned from collaboration to conflict and vice versa. We draw on three vignettes from facilitated group problem solving to illustrate how these attributes can be deployed to move conflict-mired conversations into collaborative discussions. This paper contributes to collaborative problem solving by using the formal sociological theory of boundary objects to offer a deeper, richer understanding of successes and shortcomings of visual representations as drivers of conflict resolution in model-building approaches. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 208
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making
    Ackermann, F
    Eden, C
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (01) : 47 - 66
  • [2] Ackermann F., 2005, PRACTICE MAKING STRA
  • [3] ScriptsMap: A tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops
    Ackermann, Fran
    Andersen, David F.
    Eden, Colin
    Richardson, George P.
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (04): : 427 - 434
  • [4] FUTURE OF OPERATIONAL-RESEARCH IS PAST
    ACKOFF, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1979, 30 (02) : 93 - 104
  • [5] Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P187, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<187::AID-SDR124>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-O
  • [7] Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-7
  • [9] Argyris C., 1993, KNOWLEDGE IN ACTION
  • [10] Blumer H., 1986, Symbolic Interactionism: perspective and Method