Land- use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro- economic model comparison

被引:220
作者
Schmitz, Christoph [1 ]
van Meijl, Hans [2 ]
Kyle, Page [3 ]
Nelson, Gerald C. [4 ,5 ]
Fujimori, Shinichiro [6 ]
Gurgel, Angelo [7 ]
Havlik, Petr [8 ]
Heyhoe, Edwina [9 ]
d'Croz, Daniel Mason [4 ]
Popp, Alexander [1 ]
Sands, Ron [10 ]
Tabeau, Andrzej [2 ]
van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique [11 ]
von Lampe, Martin [12 ]
Wise, Marshall [3 ]
Blanc, Elodie [13 ]
Hasegawa, Tomoko [6 ]
Kavallari, Aikaterini [2 ]
Valin, Hugo [8 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst LEI, NL-2585 DB The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Pacific NW Natl Lab, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[4] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61801 USA
[6] NIES, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[7] Sao Paulo Sch Econ EESP FGV, BR-01332000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[8] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[9] ABARES, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[10] Econ Res Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[11] Food & Agr Org United Nations FAO, I-00153 Rome, Italy
[12] OECD, F-75775 Paris 16, France
[13] MIT, Joint Program Sci & Policy Global Change, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
C61; C68; Q11; Q54; Land-use change; Model intercomparison; Land-use models; Land expansion; CROP PRODUCTIVITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD DEMAND; AGRICULTURE; CARBON; SCENARIOS; EMISSIONS; FUTURE; TRADE;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12090
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Changes in agricultural land use have important implications for environmental services. Previous studies of agricultural land-use futures have been published indicating large uncertainty due to different model assumptions and methodologies. In this article we present a first comprehensive comparison of global agro-economic models that have harmonized drivers of population, GDP, and biophysical yields. The comparison allows us to ask two research questions: (1) How much cropland will be used under different socioeconomic and climate change scenarios? (2) How can differences in model results be explained? The comparison includes four partial and six general equilibrium models that differ in how they model land supply and amount of potentially available land. We analyze results of two different socioeconomic scenarios and three climate scenarios (one with constant climate). Most models (7 out of 10) project an increase of cropland of 10-25% by 2050 compared to 2005 (under constant climate), but one model projects a decrease. Pasture land expands in some models, which increase the treat on natural vegetation further. Across all models most of the cropland expansion takes place in South America and sub-Saharan Africa. In general, the strongest differences in model results are related to differences in the costs of land expansion, the endogenous productivity responses, and the assumptions about potential cropland.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 84
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Ahammad H., 2014, AGR EC IN PRESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AGRO ECOLOGICAL ZONI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 1203 ESA UN FAO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL, V5
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTION WORKING
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FAOSTAT-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistical Database
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEM CY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, AGR POL OECD COUNTR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies on the Edge-WRI