International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group

被引:290
作者
Leydesdorff, Loet [1 ]
Wagner, Caroline S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] SRI Int, Arlington, VA 22209 USA
关键词
Scientific collaboration; Social network analysis; Science policy; Social systems; Co-authorship;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
International collaboration as measured by co-authorship relations on refereed papers grew linearly from 1990 to 2005 in terms of the number of papers, but exponentially in terms of the number of international addresses. This confirms Persson et al.' s [ Persson, O., Glanzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometrics values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421 - 432] hypothesis of an inflation in international collaboration. Patterns in international collaboration in science can be considered as network effects, since there is no political institution mediating relationships at that level except for the initiatives of the European Commission. Science at the international level shares features with other complex adaptive systems whose order arises from the interactions of hundreds of agents pursuing self-interested strategies. During the period 2000 - 2005, the network of global collaborations appears to have reinforced the formation of a core group of fourteen most cooperative countries. This core group can be expected to use knowledge from the global network with great efficiency, since these countries have strong national systems. Countries at the periphery may be disadvantaged by the increased strength of the core. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient [J].
Ahlgren, P ;
Jarneving, B ;
Rousseau, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (06) :550-560
[2]   Mapping the backbone of science [J].
Boyack, KW ;
Klavans, R ;
Börner, K .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 64 (03) :351-374
[3]   CENTRALITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION [J].
FREEMAN, LC .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1979, 1 (03) :215-239
[4]   SET OF MEASURES OF CENTRALITY BASED ON BETWEENNESS [J].
FREEMAN, LC .
SOCIOMETRY, 1977, 40 (01) :35-41
[5]   Global cooperation in research [J].
Georghiou, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (06) :611-626
[6]   SIMILARITY MEASURES IN SCIENTOMETRIC RESEARCH - THE JACCARD INDEX VERSUS SALTON COSINE FORMULA [J].
HAMERS, L ;
HEMERYCK, Y ;
HERWEYERS, G ;
JANSSEN, M ;
KETERS, H ;
ROUSSEAU, R ;
VANHOUTTE, A .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1989, 25 (03) :315-318
[7]   Is the European Union becoming a single publication system? [J].
Leydesdorff, L .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2000, 47 (02) :265-280
[8]   WORDS AND CO-WORDS AS INDICATORS OF INTELLECTUAL ORGANIZATION [J].
LEYDESDORFF, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1989, 18 (04) :209-223
[9]  
Leydesdorff L, 2007, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V58, P2411, DOI 10.1002/asi.20691
[10]   Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (09) :1303-1319