Use of a pine bark extract and antioxidant vitamin combination product as therapy for migraine in patients refractory to pharmacologic medication

被引:27
作者
Chayasirisobhon, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Anaheim, CA 92807 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2006年 / 46卷 / 05期
关键词
migraine; antioxidant; pine bark extract; MIDAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00454.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-To evaluate the potential benefit of a pine bark extract and antioxidant vitamin combination product in the treatment of migraine headache. Background.-This was an uncontrolled preliminary study to investigate the potential of an antioxidant formulation as therapy for migraine headache. Methods.-Twelve patients with a long-term history of migraine with and without aura who had failed to respond to multiple treatments with beta-blockers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists were selected for the study. They were treated with 10 capsules of an antioxidant formulation of 120 mg pine bark extract, 60 mg vitamin C, and 30 IU vitamin E in each capsule daily for 3 months. Following enrollment patients completed a migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to give a baseline measure of migraine impact on work, school, domestic, and social activities over the previous 3 months. Patients were then treated for 3 months with the antioxidant formulation while continuing to receive existing pharmacologic medications. A second MIDAS was given at the conclusion of the treatment period. Results.-There was a significant mean improvement in MIDAS score of 50.6% for the 3-month treatment period compared with the 3 months prior to baseline (P < .005). The treatment was also associated with significant reductions in number of headache days and headache severity score. Mean number of headache days was reduced from 44.4 days at baseline (95% CI 28.9 to 59.8) to 26.0 days (95% CI 5.3 to 46.7; P < .005) after 3 months' therapy and mean headache severity was reduced from 7.5 of 10 (95% CI 6.7 to 8.4) to 5.5 (95% CI 4.1 to 7.0; P < .005). Conclusion.-These data suggest that the antioxidant therapy used in this study may be beneficial in the treatment of migraine possibly reducing headache frequency and severity. Further clinical investigation into the efficacy of antioxidant as therapy for chronic migraine is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 793
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
BALWIN AS, 1996, ANNU REV IMMUNOL, V14, P649
[2]
A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF NAPROXEN SODIUM, PIZOTYLINE AND PLACEBO IN MIGRAINE PROPHYLAXIS [J].
BELLAVANCE, AJ ;
MELOCHE, JP .
HEADACHE, 1990, 30 (11) :710-715
[3]
CAPABLANCO DJ, 1996, MAYO CLIN P, V71, P1055
[4]
AMITRIPTYLINE IN PROPHYLAXIS OF MIGRAINE [J].
COUCH, JR ;
ZIEGLER, DK ;
HASSANEIN, R .
NEUROLOGY, 1976, 26 (02) :121-127
[5]
Possible mechanisms of valproate in migraine prophylaxis [J].
Cutrer, FM ;
Limmroth, V ;
Moskowitz, MA .
CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (02) :93-100
[6]
DIENER HC, 1994, REV CONTEMP PHARMACO, V5, P271
[7]
Redox regulation of NF-kappa B activation [J].
Flohe, L ;
Brigelius-Flohe, R ;
Saliou, C ;
Traber, MG ;
Packer, L .
FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1997, 22 (06) :1115-1126
[8]
*HEAD CLASS COMM I, 1988, CEPHALALGIA S7, V8, P19
[9]
Mathew NT, 2003, NEUROLOGY, V60, pS45
[10]
Efficacy of gabapentin in migraine prophylaxis [J].
Mathew, NT ;
Rapoport, A ;
Saper, J ;
Magnus, L ;
Klapper, J ;
Ramadan, N ;
Stacey, B ;
Tepper, S .
HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (02) :119-128