The effects of bonus payments on emergency service performance in Victoria

被引:25
作者
Cameron, PA
Kennedy, MP
McNeil, JJ
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Monash Med Sch, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123630.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives: To review and analyse the system effects of the Emergency Service Enhancement Program (ESEP): bonus payments made to public hospitals to improve access to care for patients attending emergency departments. Design: A review of the first 3 years' performance data, obtained from the Victorian Emergency Department Minimum Dataset (VEMD). Setting: 21 public hospital emergency departments in Victoria, Australia (population 4.5 million), with about 700 000 patient attendances per year. The ESEP began in April 1995. Main outcome measures: The ESEP indicators of emergency department and inpatient bed access: occasions of "ambulance bypass" (emergency department unable to accept patients arriving by ambulance); emergency waiting times for Category 1, 2 and 3 patients (National Triage Scale) compared with agreed national performance thresholds; and "access block" (>12 hours' waiting time in the emergency department before admission to hospital). Results: The number of occasions of ambulance bypass per quarter decreased from 600 in 1994 to fewer than 100 in 1997 (P < 0.001). Despite an increased proportion of patient encounters in triage categories 1, 2 and 3 (31% v. 23%), zero waiting times for Category 1 patients were consistently adhered to, and adherence to waiting time thresholds for Category 2 and 3 patients improved significantly (P < 0.001, R-2 = 0.74; and P < 0.035, R-2 = 0.37, respectively), particularly for Category 2 patients. The number of patients waiting longer than 12 hours in emergency departments decreased nonsignificantly (P = 0.3, R-2 = 0.1). Conclusion: Our results show that the ESEP has produced sustained improvements in all the indicators linked with bonus payments.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 246
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Australasian College of Emergency Medicine, 1994, EMERGEN MED, V6, P145
[2]
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SATISFACTION - WHAT MATTERS MOST [J].
BURSCH, B ;
BEEZY, J ;
SHAW, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (03) :586-591
[3]
*CONS COUNC EM CRI, 1991, REV EM DEP CRIT CAR
[4]
*COOP LYBR CONS, 1997, DEV AGR SET NAT ACC
[5]
Erwich M., 1997, EMERGEN MED, V9, P181
[6]
HAUGHTON G, 1995, BR J GEN PRACT, V45, P677
[7]
*HLTH COMM SERV, 1995, EM SERV ENH PROGR
[8]
Do performance indicators make a difference? [J].
Kazandjian, VA ;
Thomson, RG ;
Law, WR ;
Waldron, K .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (07) :482-491
[9]
LITTLE NE, 1991, EMERGENCY MED RISK M, P11
[10]
Nerenz D R, 1993, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, V19, P577