End use technology choice in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors

被引:38
作者
Wilkerson, Jordan T. [1 ]
Cullenward, Danny [2 ,3 ]
Davidian, Danielle [1 ]
Weyant, John P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Environm & Resources E IPER, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Energy models; Consumer preferences; Behavior; Energy forecasting; IMPACTS; FORECASTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) is arguably the most influential energy model in the United States. The U.S. Energy Information Administration uses NEMS to generate the federal government's annual long-term forecast of national energy consumption and to evaluate prospective federal energy policies. NEMS is considered such a standard tool that other models are calibrated to its forecasts, in both government and academic practice. As a result, NEMS has a significant influence over expert opinions of plausible energy futures. NEMS is a massively detailed model whose inner workings, despite its prominence, receive relatively scant critical attention. This paper analyzes how NEMS projects energy demand in the residential and commercial sectors. In particular, we focus on the role of consumers' preferences and financial constraints, investigating how consumers choose appliances and other end-use technologies. We identify conceptual issues in the approach the model takes to the same question across both sectors. Running the model with a range of consumer preferences, we estimate the extent to which this issue impacts projected consumption relative to the baseline model forecast for final energy demand in the year 2035. In the residential sector, the impact ranges from a decrease of 0.73 quads (-6.0%) to an increase of 0.24 quads (+2.0%). In the commercial sector, the impact ranges from a decrease of 1.0 quads (-9.0%) to an increase of 0.99 quads (+9.0%). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 784
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ORNLCON476 INT WORK
[2]  
Ascher William., 1978, Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners
[3]   The rationality of EIA forecasts under symmetric and asymmetric loss [J].
Auffhammer, Maximilian .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (02) :102-121
[4]  
Bataille C, 2006, ENERG J, P93
[5]   Special issue - Scenarios for a clean energy future [J].
Brown, MA ;
Short, W ;
Levine, MD .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1177-1177
[6]   The forest products industry at an energy/climate crossroads [J].
Brown, Marilyn A. ;
Baek, Youngsun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7665-7675
[7]   The potential impacts of climate-change policy on freshwater use in thermoelectric power generation [J].
Chandel, Munish K. ;
Pratson, Lincoln F. ;
Jackson, Robert B. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :6234-6242
[8]  
Chien D., 2005, J. Trans. Stat, V8, P43
[9]  
Creyts J.C., 2007, REDUCING US GREENHOU
[10]  
Cullenward D., 2009, AM STAT ASS COMM EN