A comparative study on the quality of China's eco-city: Suzhou vs Kitakyushu

被引:24
作者
Li, Yan [1 ]
Qiu, Limin [2 ]
机构
[1] Ristumeikan Asia Pacific Univ, Coll Asia Pacific Studies, Beppu, Oita 8748577, Japan
[2] Shanghai Environm Protect Bur, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Eco-city; China; Sustainable development; Indicator; Environmental quality; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.005
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
China is experiencing rapid urbanization, which increasingly brings pressure on the ambient environment of local cities as well as the resources and ecology of the globe. Hence the Chinese government has been taking vigorous efforts in developing eco-cities across the nation to pursue sustainable development. This study reviews the development of the eco-city framework of the national government of China, and investigates the quality of Chinese eco-cities through an international case-study comparative analysis. The two cases, Suzhou (China) and Kitakyushu (Japan) are both honored as the best practice of eco-cities in their respective countries. The comparative analysis uses 19 indicators of the Chinese national eco-city framework. Results show that Suzhou has made remarkable progress in green space creation and environmental infrastructure construction. However, huge gaps in various indicators, especially the environmental quality performances, reveal the poor levels of pollution in Chinese cities, even in the so-called eco-cities. The rural urban disparity and the energy consumption efficiency also call for more attention. Recommendations are made for the eco-city framework including raising the environmental standards, setting up a re-examination system in order to ensure the environmental quality, incorporating indicators related to waste recycling, and designing a new set of indicators for the social aspect. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WORLD URB PROSP 2011
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews
[4]   Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? [J].
Bulkeley, Harriet .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2006, 38 (06) :1029-1044
[5]  
Cai Y., 2012, REDEFINING URBAN NEW
[6]  
CAO, 2015, ENV MOD CIT ENV FUT
[7]  
Chinese Society for Urban Studies, 2011, CHIN LOW CARB EC DEV
[8]  
City of Kitakyushu, 2015, REST SOOT SKY DEAD S
[9]  
Cugurullo F., 2015, URBAN STUDIES, V52
[10]  
European Union, 2010, WORLD EUR SUST CIT