Comparison of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in treating bacterial corneal ulcers

被引:118
作者
Hyndiuk, RA
Eiferman, RA
Caldwell, DR
Rosenwasser, GO
Santos, CI
Katz, HR
Badrinath, SS
Reddy, MK
Adenis, JP
Klauss, V
COhen, E
MarechalCourtois, C
Murta, J
Darrell, RW
Denis, P
Heidemann, DH
Insler, MS
John, T
Klauss, V
Lass, JH
Limberg, MB
McCulley, JP
Rosenwasser, GOD
Rowsey, JJ
Santos, C
Sher, N
Ullman, S
Verin, P
Wilhelmus, KR
Wills, R
Wolf, TC
机构
[1] SPRINGS MED CTR, LOUISVILLE, KY USA
[2] TULANE UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT OPHTHALMOL, NEW ORLEANS, LA USA
[3] PENN STATE UNIV, DEPT OPHTHALMOL, HERSHEY, PA USA
[4] SINAI HOSP, KRIEGER EYE INST, BALTIMORE, MD 21215 USA
[5] MED & VIS RES FDN, MADRAS, TAMIL NADU, INDIA
[6] LV PRASAD EYE INST, HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA
[7] CHU DUPUYTREN, LIMOGES, FRANCE
[8] TECH UNIV MUNCHEN WEIHENSTEPHAN, EYE CLIN, MUNICH, GERMANY
[9] SERV OPHTHALMOL, LIMOGES, FRANCE
[10] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV, WILLS EYE HOSP, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107 USA
[11] SERV OPHTHALMOL, LIEGE, BELGIUM
[12] CLIN OFTALMOL, COIMBRA, PORTUGAL
[13] COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN MED CTR, NEW YORK, NY USA
[14] MICHIGAN CORNEA CONSULTANTS, SOUTHFIELD, MI USA
[15] MED COLL WISCONSIN, MILWAUKEE, WI 53226 USA
[16] LOUISIANA STATE UNIV, CTR EYE, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112 USA
[17] CHICAGO CORNEA RES CTR, TINLEY PK, IL USA
[18] UNIV HOSP CLEVELAND, CLEVELAND, OH 44106 USA
[19] UNIV TEXAS, DALLAS, TX 75230 USA
[20] LV PRASAD EYE INST, HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA
[21] UNIV S FLORIDA, DEPT OPHTHALMOL, TAMPA, FL USA
[22] PHILLIPS EYE INST, MINNEAPOLIS, MN USA
[23] MED CTR CLIN, PENSACOLA, FL USA
[24] SERV OPHTHALMOL, BORDEAUX, FRANCE
[25] BAYLOR COLL MED, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[26] MARSHFIELD CLIN FDN MED RES & EDUC, MARSHFIELD, WI 54449 USA
[27] MCGEE EYE INST, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30416-8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% (Ciloxan) with a standard therapy regimen (fortified tobramycin, 1.3%-cefazolin, 5.0%) for treating bacterial corneal ulcers. Methods: This randomized, parallel group, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted in 324 patients at 28 centers in the United States, Europe, and India. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 160 to ciprofloxacin and 164 to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin. Positive microbiologic cultures were obtained in 188 (58%) of 324 patients. Of these, 176 patients met protocol criteria and were evaluated for treatment efficacy: 82 in the ciprofloxacin group and 94 in the standard therapy group. The dosing schedule for both treatment groups was 1 to 2 drops of the first study medication (ciprofloxacin or fortified tobramycin) every 30 minutes for 6 hours, then hourly for the remainder of day 1, 1 to 2 drops every hour on days 2 and 3; 1 to 2 drops every 2 hours on days 4 and 5, followed by 1 to 2 drops every 4 hours on days 6 to 14. The second medication (ciprofloxacin or cefazolin) was instilled 5 to 15 minutes after the first drug, following the same dosing frequency. Physician's judgment of clinical success, cure rate, changes in ocular signs, and symptoms and the rate of treatment failures were the primary efficacy criteria. Results: Topical ciprofloxacin monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to the standard therapy regimen of fortified antibiotics. No statistically significant treatment differences were found between ciprofloxacin (91.5%) and standard therapy (86.2%) in terms of overall clinical efficacy (P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were noted in resolution of the clinical signs and symptoms (P > 0.08) or the time to cure (P = 0.55). The incidence of treatment failures was less in the ciprofloxacin group (8.5%) compared with the standard therapy group (13.8%). Significantly fewer patients treated with ciprofloxacin reported discomfort than did patients treated with the standard therapy regimen (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to standard therapy (fortified tobramycin-cefazolin) for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers and produces significantly less discomfort.
引用
收藏
页码:1854 / 1862
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   INVITRO ACTIVITY OF NEWER QUINOLONES AGAINST AEROBIC-BACTERIA [J].
AUCKENTHALER, R ;
MICHEAHAMZEHPOUR, M ;
PECHERE, JC .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 17 :29-39
[2]  
BAUM J, 1983, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V90, P162
[3]  
Baum J, 1982, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V80, P369
[4]  
BAUM JL, 1979, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V24, P97, DOI 10.1016/0039-6257(79)90127-9
[5]   THE POTENTIAL USE OF QUINOLONES IN FUTURE OCULAR ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY [J].
BORRMANN, LR ;
LEOPOLD, IH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (02) :227-229
[6]  
CALLEGAN MC, 1994, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V35, P1033
[7]  
DELAEY JJ, 1991, CHIBRET INT J OPHTHA, V8, P51
[8]  
DONNENFELD ED, 1994, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V101, P902
[9]  
Eliopoulos G. M., 1993, P161
[10]   LOADING DOSES AND EXTENDED DOSING INTERVALS IN TOPICAL GENTAMICIN THERAPY [J].
GLASSER, DB ;
GARDNER, S ;
ELLIS, JG ;
PETTIT, TH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1985, 99 (03) :329-332