Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens

被引:101
作者
Shaffer, Lisa G. [1 ]
Coppinger, Justine [1 ]
Alliman, Sarah [1 ]
Torchia, Beth A. [1 ]
Theisen, Aaron [1 ]
Ballif, Blake C. [1 ]
Bejjani, Bassem A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Signature Genom Labs, Spokane, WA 99202 USA
关键词
array CGH; chromosome abnormality; dysmorphic features; malformation; copy number variant;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2053
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the detection rate by microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in a prenatal Population to that of a neonatal population referred for diagnostic testing. Methods Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis was performed for 151 prenatal cases and compared with the results from 1375 postnatal cases less than 3 months of age. Results Two of 15 1 prenatal cases (1.3%) showed a clinically significant cytogenetic abnormality. In contrast, of the 1375 postnatal cases studied, 11.4% showed a cytogenetic abnormality by aCGH. Many of these (40%) were referred for aCGH because of dysmorphic features, a clinical indication unlikely to be identified ill the prenatal population. Conclusions The chance of detecting a chromosome abnormality in a prenatal Population that has already been screened by routine cytogenetics is similar to 1.3%. However, given that many of the abnormal array results in the neonatal population were among those with dysmorphic features as the primary indication for testing, which are not easily identifiable by ultrasound, offering prenatal testing by aCGH to a wider population would likely result in it higher detection rate. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 795
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V109, P217
[2]   Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: Is less more? [J].
Bejjani, BA ;
Saleki, R ;
Ballif, BC ;
Rorem, EA ;
Sundin, K ;
Theisen, A ;
Kashork, CD ;
Shaffer, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2005, 134A (03) :259-267
[3]   Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis [J].
Benn, PA ;
Egan, JFX ;
Fang, M ;
Smith-Bindman, R .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) :1255-1260
[4]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL ANOMALIES DURING THE 2ND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY - THEIR CHARACTERIZATION AND DELINEATION OF DEFECTS IN PREGNANCIES AT RISK [J].
DALLAIRE, L ;
MICHAUD, J ;
MELANCON, SB ;
POTIER, M ;
LAMBERT, M ;
MITCHELL, G ;
BOISVERT, J .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1991, 11 (08) :629-635
[5]   Epidemiology of choanal atresia with special reference to the CHARGE association [J].
Harris, J ;
Robert, E ;
Kallen, B .
PEDIATRICS, 1997, 99 (03) :363-367
[6]   The epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia in Sweden [J].
Källén, B ;
Tornqvist, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) :345-350
[7]   CONGENITAL ANOMALIES IN NEWBORN INFANT INCLUDING MINOR VARIATIONS - STUDY OF 4412 BABIES BY SURFACE EXAMINATION FOR ANOMALIES + BUCCAL SMEAR FOR SEX CHROMATIN [J].
MARDEN, PM ;
SMITH, DW ;
MCDONALD, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1964, 64 (03) :357-+
[8]   Controversies and challenges of array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal genetic diagnosis [J].
Pergament, Euvene .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 9 (09) :596-599
[9]   Screening for subtelomeric chromosome alteration in a consecutive series of newborns with congenital defects [J].
Rodriguez, Laura ;
Luisa Martinez-Fernandez, Maria ;
Mansilla, Elena ;
Mendioroz, Jacobo ;
Maria Arteaga, Rosa ;
Fernandez Toral, Joaquin ;
Martinez Guardia, Nieves ;
Garcia, Angel ;
Centeno, Fernando ;
Pantoja, Jorge ;
Jovani, Carmen ;
Luisa Martinez-Frias, Maria .
CLINICAL DYSMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 17 (01) :5-12
[10]  
Rosano A, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V93, P110, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000717)93:2<110::AID-AJMG6>3.0.CO