A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms

被引:225
作者
Beard, Courtney [1 ]
Amir, Nader [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Social anxiety; Interpretation; Information processing; Treatment; Training;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that socially anxious individuals interpret ambiguous social information in a more threatening manner compared to non-anxious individuals. Recently, studies have experimentally modified interpretation and shown that this subsequently affected anxiety in non-anxious individuals. If similar procedures can modify interpretation biases in socially anxious individuals, they may lead to a reduction in social anxiety symptoms. In the current study, we examined the effect of a computerized Interpretation Modification Program (IMP) on interpretation bias and social anxiety symptoms. Twenty-seven socially anxious individuals were randomly assigned to the IMP or a control condition. Participants completed eight computer sessions over four weeks. The IMP modified interpretation by providing positive feedback when participants made benign interpretations and negative feedback in response to threat interpretations. The IMP successfully decreased threat interpretations, increased benign interpretations, and decreased social anxiety symptoms compared to the control condition. Moreover, changes in benign interpretation mediated IMP's effect on social anxiety. This initial trial suggests that interpretation modification may have clinical utility when applied as a multi-session intervention. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1141
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AMIR N, 1998, BEHAV RES THER, V36, P945, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00060-6
[2]  
Beck A. T., 1996, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. Psychological corporation
[3]  
Clark D. M., 1995, SOCIAL PHOBIA DIAGNO, P69, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1997)5:13.0.CO
[4]  
2-6
[5]   Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety [J].
Constans, JI ;
Penn, DL ;
Ihen, GH ;
Hope, DA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 (07) :643-651
[6]   A comparison of social phobia outcome measures in cognitive-behavioral group therapy [J].
Cox, BJ ;
Ross, L ;
Swinson, RP ;
Direnfeld, DM .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1998, 22 (03) :285-297
[7]   Interpretation bias: A comparison of treated social phobics, untreated social phobics, and controls [J].
Franklin, ME ;
Huppert, J ;
Langner, R ;
Leiberg, S ;
Foa, EB .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (03) :289-300
[8]   Normative values for the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Fear Questionnaire, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory [J].
Gillis, MM ;
Haaga, DAF ;
Ford, GT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :450-455
[9]   Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity [J].
Grey, S ;
Mathews, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (04) :1143-1162
[10]   Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events [J].
Hirsch, C ;
Mathews, A .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (12) :1123-1132