Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel's Transformation to Platform Leader

被引:196
作者
Gawer, Annabelle [1 ]
Phillips, Nelson [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Business Sch, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Aalto Univ Business Sch, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
collective identity; institutional change; institutional logics; institutional work; organizational identity; practice; platforms; ORGANIZATIONAL FIELD; COMPETING LOGICS; TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CREATION; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0170840613492071
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this article, we explore some of the forms of institutional work that organizations perform as they participate externally in the processes that drive change in the institutional logic that characterizes their field, and as they respond internally to the shift as it occurs. More specifically, we present the results of an in-depth case study of Intel Corporation, a firm that was implicated in a fundamental shift in the institutional logic of its field in the late 1980s and 1990s as the field moved from a traditional supply chain logic dominated by computer assemblers to a new platform logic following very different organizing principles. Through the qualitative analysis of 72 interviews with Intel employees, complemented by extensive archival data from 1980 to 2000, we identify two forms of institutional work that Intel performed externally - external practice work and legitimacy work - and two forms of work that they carried out internally - internal practice work and identity work - as the organization worked to simultaneously influence the shift in logic that was occurring and to deal with the ramifications of the shift.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1071
页数:37
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Albert Yu, 1998, CREATING DIGITAL FUT
[2]  
Ann Glynn Mary, 2008, SAGE HDB ORG I, P357
[3]  
Annabelle G., 2002, Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], PRODUCT DESIGN DEV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
[7]  
Anselm e CORBIN Juliet S TRAUSS., 1998, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
[8]  
Baldwin Carliss Y., 2000, Design rules: The power of modularity
[9]  
Bresnahan TF, 1999, J IND ECON, V47, P1
[10]   The Rhetoric of Institutional Change [J].
Brown, Andrew D. ;
Ainsworth, Susan ;
Grant, David .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2012, 33 (03) :297-321