Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice

被引:256
作者
Armitage, Derek [1 ]
de Loe, Rob
Plummer, Ryan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Environm & Resource Studies, Fac Environm, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Stockholm, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Brock Univ, Dept Tourism & Environm, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2012年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
Adaptation; environmental conservation; conservation policy; resource management; sustainability; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFFS; KNOWLEDGE; ACCOUNTABILITY; COPRODUCTION; RESEARCHERS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00238.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Governments are no longer the most important source of decision making in the environmental field. Instead, new actors are playing critical decision-making roles, and new mechanisms and forums for decision making are becoming important (e.g., in some contexts regulation is being supplemented or replaced by markets and cooperative arrangements). New ways of governing in relation to the environment have important implications for the practice of conservation. Greater awareness of key ideas and concepts of environmental governance can help conservation managers and scientists participate more effectively in governance processes. Understanding how conservation practice is influenced by emergent hybrid and network governance arrangements is particularly important. This short review explores key environmental governance concepts relevant to the practice of conservation, with specific reference to institutional fit and scale; adaptiveness, flexibility and learning; the coproduction of knowledge from diverse sources; the emergence of new actors and their roles in governance; and changing expectations about accountability and legitimacy. Case-based examples highlight key directions in environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 255
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] DISMANTLING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
    AGRAWAL, A
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1995, 26 (03) : 413 - 439
  • [2] Can adaptive management help us embrace the Murray-Darling Basin's wicked problems?
    Allan, Catherine
    [J]. ADAPTIVE AND INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT: COPING WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, : 61 - 73
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1 ESG IHDP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy-Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781849806411
  • [5] [Anonymous], EC HUM WELLB SYNTH
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, REINDEER MANAGEMENT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2000, Can Africa Claim the 21st Century?
  • [8] Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic
    Armitage, Derek
    Berkes, Fikret
    Dale, Aaron
    Kocho-Schellenberg, Erik
    Patton, Eva
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (03): : 995 - 1004
  • [9] Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity
    Armitage, Derek R.
    Plummer, Ryan
    Berkes, Fikret
    Arthur, Robert I.
    Charles, Anthony T.
    Davidson-Hunt, Iain J.
    Diduck, Alan P.
    Doubleday, Nancy C.
    Johnson, Derek S.
    Marschke, Melissa
    McConney, Patrick
    Pinkerton, Evelyn W.
    Wollenberg, Eva K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (02) : 95 - 102
  • [10] Berkes F., 2018, SACRED ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203928950