A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks

被引:133
作者
Briggs, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Environm Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W2 1PG, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1476-069X-7-61
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy. Integrated environmental health impact assessment is defined as a means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interventions that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexities, interdependencies and uncertainties of the real world. As such, it depends heavily on how issues are selected and framed, and implies the involvement of stakeholders both in issue-framing and design of the assessment, and to help interpret and evaluate the results. It is also a comparative process, which involves evaluating and comparing different scenarios. It consequently requires the ability to model the way in which the influences of exogenous factors, such as policies or other interventions, feed through the environment to affect health. Major challenges thus arise. Chief amongst these are the difficulties in ensuring effective stakeholder participation, in dealing with the multicausal and non-linear nature of many of the relationships between environment and health, and in taking account of adaptive and behavioural changes that characterise the systems concerned.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
ALBALA B, 2000, OXFORD DEV STUD, V28, P187
[2]   Integrated assessment of emission control scenarios, including the impact of tropospheric ozone [J].
Amann, M ;
Baldi, M ;
Heyes, C ;
Klimont, Z ;
Schopp, W .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 85 (04) :2595-2600
[3]   Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review [J].
Anand, S ;
Hanson, K .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (06) :685-702
[4]   Public participation in life cycle assessment and risk assessment: A shared need [J].
Anex, RP ;
Focht, W .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (05) :861-877
[5]  
[Anonymous], COM2004416 COMM EUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], EUR STRAT SEC EN SUP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, J CHILDRENS HLTH, DOI DOI 10.3109/15417060490906477
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Identifying the environmental causes of disease: How should we decide what to believe and when to take action? [Report]
[9]   Corrections in the atomic bomb data to examine low dose risk [J].
Baker, GS ;
Hoel, DG .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2003, 85 (06) :709-720
[10]   Opening the debate on DALYs [J].
Barker, C ;
Green, A .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1996, 11 (02) :179-183