Diffusion is no illusion - Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy

被引:249
作者
Brinks, D [2 ]
Coppedge, M
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Polit Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Govt, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
democracy; diffusion; democratization; regime; income;
D O I
10.1177/0010414005276666
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article develops and tests a specific model of the role of diffusion as a determinant of the magnitude and direction of regime change, using a database covering the world from 1972 to 1996. The authors find that countries tend to change their regimes to match the average degree of democracy or non-democracy found among their contiguous neighbors and that countries in the U.S. sphere of influence tended to become more democratic in the period examined. They also confirm that countries tend to follow the direction in which the majority of other countries in the world are moving. Their model builds on several findings in the diffusion literature but adds methodological improvements and includes more extensive controls for other variables that have been found to affect regime change-including levels of development, presidentialism, and regional differences-offering further support for some and challenging other findings of the regime change literature.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 489
页数:27
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Adam Przeworski, 2000, DEMOCRACY DEV POLITI, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511804946, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804946]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Politics Society
[3]  
[Anonymous], FREED WORLD COUNTR R
[4]   Time-series-cross-section-data: What have we learned in the past few years? [J].
Beck, N .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 4 :271-293
[5]   Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable [J].
Beck, N ;
Katz, JN ;
Tucker, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (04) :1260-1288
[7]   DEMOCRACY, STABILITY, AND DICHOTOMIES [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
JACKMAN, RW .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 54 (04) :612-621
[8]   Income inequality and democratization revisited: Comment on Muller [J].
Bollen, KA ;
Jackman, RW .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 60 (06) :983-989
[9]  
BOLLEN KA, 1991, ON MEASURING DEMOCRACY, P3
[10]   Subjective measures of liberal democracy [J].
Bollen, KA ;
Paxton, P .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2000, 33 (01) :58-86