Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain

被引:98
作者
Palos, GR
Mendoza, TR
Mobley, GM
Cantor, SB
Cleeland, CS
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, Unit 221, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
pain severity; cutpoints; pain assessment; numerical rating scale; NRS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical practice guidelines recommend that numeric rating scales be used to document the severity of perceived pain, yet patients and clinicians often opt to use simpler classification systems such as mild, moderate, or severe. To assess how well the numeric scales correlate with the tri-level classification system for describing pain severity, we conducted a subanalysis of a larger population-based study of pain management preferences. Our primary objective was to identify the numeric boundaries used by 287 adults to describe pain as mild, moderate, or severe. We examined differences in the means of the upper and lower limits for mild, moderate, and severe pain according to demographic characteristics and type of pain. Ranges reported for each pain level were 1.3 to 3.6 (mild), 4.3 to 6.5 (moderate), and 7.5 to 9.8 (severe). The primary finding was that "healthy" community adults rated the pain severity cutpoints much as patients with clinical pain did, 1 to 4 for mild, 5 to 6 for moderate, and 7 to 10 for severe. These results suggest that numeric rating scales can be used in clinical practice with both patients and community-dwelling adults. Our findings also support encouraging the general public to use a 0 to 10 scale to rate their pain intensity. Perspective: Methods used to describe numeric cutpoints for mild, moderate, and severe pain were applied to community adults. Having standard categories to describe pain severity might increase clinicians' confidence in using a numeric scale to make treatment decisions. Further studies of cutpoint methodology and its clinical importance are warranted. (C) 2006 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity? [J].
Anderson, KO .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :5-6
[2]   Relationship of ethnicity, gender, and ambulatory blood pressure to pain sensitivity: Effects of individualized pain rating scales [J].
Campbell, TS ;
Hughes, JW ;
Girdler, SS ;
Maixner, W ;
Sherwood, A .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 5 (03) :183-191
[3]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[4]  
Darlington R.B., 2017, REGRESSION ANAL LINE
[5]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[6]   A MULTIPLE RANDOM STAIRCASE METHOD OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL PAIN ASSESSMENT [J].
GRACELY, RH ;
LOTA, L ;
WALTER, DJ ;
DUBNER, R .
PAIN, 1988, 32 (01) :55-63
[7]  
JCAHO, JOINT COMM ACCR HEAL
[8]   Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Smith, DG ;
Ehde, DM ;
Robinsin, LR .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (03) :317-322
[9]   Lessons learned from a multiple-dose post-operative analgesic trial [J].
Mendoza, TR ;
Chen, C ;
Brugger, A ;
Hubbard, R ;
Snabes, M ;
Palmer, SN ;
Zhang, Q ;
Cleeland, CS .
PAIN, 2004, 109 (1-2) :103-109
[10]   Perceptions of analgesic use and side effects: What the public values in pain management [J].
Palos, GR ;
Mendoza, TR ;
Cantor, SB ;
Aday, LA ;
Cleeland, CS .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (05) :460-473