Validation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry

被引:72
作者
Cadarette, SM
Jaglal, SB
Murray, TM
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, ME Muller Program, N York, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Grad Dept Community Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Canadian Multictr Osteoporosis Study Toronto Site, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Metab Bone Clin, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
bone mineral density; osteoporosis; post-menopausal; ROC analysis; screening; validation;
D O I
10.1007/s001980050199
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Bone densitometry using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the 'gold standard' for osteoporosis diagnosis. However, mass screening for osteoporosis has not been recommended, and no consensus has been reached regarding specific targeted screening programs. Recently, the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) was developed to identify postmenopausal women likely to have low BMD (less than or equal to -2.0 SD of the young adult normal), who may be selected for DXA testing. This instrument uses a case-selective approach to screen for osteoporosis by summing a score based on: age, race, rheumatoid arthritis, history of nontraumatic fracture over 45 years of age, estrogen use, and weight. In our study, SCORE was validated using 398 postmenopausal women at least 45 years of age residing within 50 km of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (one of 9 centers of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, a national population-based study). At the recommended threshold of 6, SCORE had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 32% and a positive predictive value of 64%. From receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, no threshold identified SCORE as a useful instrument in our population; area under the ROC curve was 0.71. Specificity of the SCORE is poor; at the recommended threshold of 6, 68% of those with normal bone mineral density (BMD) would be selected for bone densitometry. Development and validation of SCORE by Lydick and colleagues may have been confounded by the nature of the study sample; sampling from specialty clinics; and by the choice of outcome, combining data from different DXA machines, and using only data from the femoral neck to identify low BMD. A simple and effective approach to select patients for bone densitometry has yet to be established.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 90
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: Guidelines for the utilization of bone densitometry [J].
Baran, DT ;
Faulkner, KG ;
Genant, HK ;
Miller, PD ;
Pacifici, R .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 61 (06) :433-440
[2]
Interpretation of bone densitometry studies [J].
Blake, GM ;
Fogelman, I .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (03) :248-260
[3]
COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[4]
Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems [J].
Faulkner, KG ;
Roberts, LA ;
McClung, MR .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (06) :432-436
[5]
Standardization of BMD measurements [J].
Formica, CA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 8 (01) :1-3
[6]
GORDON M, 1995, CHRON DIS CANADA, V16, P1
[7]
A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests [J].
HajianTilaki, KO ;
Hanley, JA ;
Joseph, L ;
Collet, JP .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) :94-102
[8]
HANLEY JA, 1989, CRIT REV DIAGN IMAG, V29, P307
[9]
THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]
Hough FS, 1996, S AFR MED J, V86, P1113