An international marine-atmospheric Rn-222 measurement intercomparison in Bermuda .2. Results for the participating laboratories

被引:5
作者
Colle, R
Unterweger, MP
Hutchinson, JMR
Whittlestone, S
Polian, G
Ardouin, B
Kay, JG
Friend, JP
Blomquist, BW
Nadler, W
Dang, TT
Larsen, RJ
Hutter, AR
机构
[1] AUSTRALIAN NUCL SCI & TECHNOL ORG, MENAI, NSW 2234, AUSTRALIA
[2] CEA, CNRS, LAB MIXTE, CTR FAIBLES RADIOACT, F-91198 GIF SUR YVETTE, FRANCE
[3] DREXEL UNIV, DEPT CHEM, ATMOSPHER CHEM LABS, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 USA
[4] US DOE, ENVIRONM MEASUREMENTS LAB, NEW YORK, NY 10014 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
air; environment; intercomparison; marine atmosphere; measurement; radon-222;
D O I
10.6028/jres.101.006
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
As part of an international measurement intercomparison of instruments used to measure atmospheric Rn-222, four participating laboratories made nearly simultaneous measurements of Rn-222 activity concentration in commonly sampled, ambient air over approximately a 2 week period, and three of these four laboratories participated in the measurement comparison of 14 introduced samples with known, but undisclosed (''blind'') Rn-222 activity concentration. The exercise was conducted in Bermuda in October 1991. The Rn-222 activity concentrations in ambient Bermudian air over the course of the intercomparison ranged from a few hundredths of a Bq . m(-3) to about 2 Bq . m(-3), while the standardized sample additions covered a range from approximately 2.5 Bq . m(-3) to 35 Bq . m(-3). The overall uncertainty in the latter concentrations was in the general range of 10%, approximating a 3 standard deviation uncertainty interval. The results of the intercomparison indicated that two of the laboratories were within very good agreement with the standard additions, and almost within expected statistical variations. These same two laboratories, however, at lower ambient concentrations, exhibited a systematic difference with an averaged offset of roughly 0.3 Bq . m(-3). The third laboratory participating in the measurement of standardized sample additions was systematically low by about 65% to 70%, with respect to the standard addition which was also confirmed in their ambient air concentration measurements. The fourth laboratory, participating in only the ambient measurement part of the intercomparison, was also systematically low by at least 40% with respect to the first two laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 46
页数:26
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
CHIECO N, 1992, ENV MEASUREMENTS LAB
[2]   An international marine-atmospheric Rn-222 measurement intercomparison in Bermuda .1. NIST calibration and methodology for standardized sample additions [J].
Colle, R ;
Unterweger, MP ;
Hodge, PA ;
Hutchinson, JMR .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 101 (01) :1-19
[3]  
GIBBON E, 1962, HIST DECLINE FALL RO, V1, P121
[4]   RADON AND CN - COMPLEMENTARY TRACERS OF POLLUTED AIR MASSES AT COASTAL AND ISLAND SITES [J].
GRAS, JL ;
WHITTLESTONE, S .
JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES, 1992, 161 (01) :293-306
[5]  
GUGGENHEIM SF, 1990, WINT ANN M
[6]  
KAY JG, 1992, COMMUNICATION
[7]  
LARSEN RJ, 1992, COMMUNICATION
[8]  
NEGRO V, 1979, EML367 ENV MEAS LAB, P244
[9]  
POLIAN G, 1992, COMMUNICATION
[10]   A STUDY OF 2-FILTER METHOD FOR RADON-222 [J].
THOMAS, JW ;
LECLARE, PC .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1970, 18 (02) :113-+