Factors that influence Spanish- and English-speaking participants' decision to enroll in cancer randomized clinical trials

被引:48
作者
Ellington, L
Wahab, S
Martin, SS
Field, R
Mooney, KH
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Grad Sch Social Work, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Sch Social Work, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
randomized control trial (RCT); Spanish-speaking; English-speaking; focus groups;
D O I
10.1002/pon.943
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer randomized clinical trial (RCT) participation is low, particularly among ethnic and racial minorities. Hispanic enrollment is far below their representation in the US population, yet their cancer burden is higher. Little is known from the patient perspective about factors which influence the decision to enroll in RCTs. We asked Spanish-and English-speaking individuals what factors influence decisions about cancer RCT participation. Eight focus Groups were conducted with 55 participants (25 Spanish and 30 English-speaking). The groups were taped, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Six major themes emerged: patient-provider communication, personal relationship with provider, involvement of significant others in decision making, role of faith, need for information, and impact of discrimination on decision making. Both similarities (e.g. need for comprehensive information) and differences (e.g. need for provider acknowledgement of emotional and spiritual concerns) were found between Spanish- and English-speaking participants. Among Spanish-speaking participants, level of education was differentially related to decision-making themes. Implications for providers are discussed. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials [J].
Albrecht, TL ;
Blanchard, C ;
Ruckdeschel, JC ;
Coovert, M ;
Strongbow, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3324-3332
[2]   Understanding patient decisions about clinical trials and the associated communication process: A preliminary report [J].
Albrecht, TL ;
Penner, LA ;
Ruckdeschel, JC .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2003, 18 (04) :210-214
[3]   Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services - Bias, preference, or poor communication? [J].
Ashton, CM ;
Haidet, P ;
Paterniti, DA ;
Collins, TC ;
Gordon, HS ;
O'Malley, K ;
Petersen, LA ;
Sharf, BF ;
Suarez-Almazor, ME ;
Wray, NP ;
Street, RL .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (02) :146-152
[4]   Centering families in cancer communication research: acknowledging the impact of support, culture and process on client/provider communication in cancer management [J].
Ballard-Reisch, DS ;
Letner, JA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (01) :61-66
[5]   ETHNICITY AND ATTITUDES TOWARD PATIENT AUTONOMY [J].
BLACKHALL, LJ ;
MURPHY, ST ;
FRANK, G ;
MICHEL, V ;
AZEN, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (10) :820-825
[6]   Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials [J].
Comis, RL ;
Miller, JD ;
Aldigé, CR ;
Krebs, L ;
Stoval, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :830-835
[7]  
DENZIN NormanK., 2013, LANDSCAPE QUALITATIV, V4th
[8]   Participation of minorities in cancer research: The influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors [J].
Giuliano, AR ;
Mokuau, N ;
Hughes, C ;
Tortolero-Luna, G ;
Risendal, B ;
Ho, RCS ;
Prewitt, TE ;
McCaskill-Stevens, WJ .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (08) :S22-S34
[9]   Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process [J].
Grant, CH ;
Cissna, KN ;
Rosenfeld, LB .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2000, 12 (01) :23-39
[10]  
Huerta E E, 1999, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P23