Differing risk profiles for individual fracture sites: Evidence from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women (GLOW)

被引:42
作者
FitzGerald, Gordon [1 ]
Boonen, Steven [2 ]
Compston, Juliet E. [3 ]
Pfeilschifter, Johannes [4 ]
LaCroix, Andrea Z. [5 ]
Hosmer, David W., Jr. [1 ]
Hooven, Frederick H. [1 ]
Gehlbach, Stephen H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts UMASS, Ctr Outcomes Res, Sch Med, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Geriatr Med, Leuven Univ Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[4] Alfried Krupp Hosp, Dept Internal Med 3, Essen, Germany
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
MAJOR FRACTURE; COX MODEL; MODEL DISCRIMINATION; C-STATISTIC; C INDEX; GOODNESS OF FIT; OLDER WOMEN; PREDICTION; MODEL; BMD;
D O I
10.1002/jbmr.1652
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
The purposes of this study were to examine fracture risk profiles at specific bone sites, and to understand why model discrimination using clinical risk factors is generally better in hip fracture models than in models that combine hip with other bones. Using 3-year data from the GLOW study (54,229 women with more than 4400 total fractures), we present Cox regression model results for 10 individual fracture sites, for both any and first-time fracture, among women aged =55 years. Advanced age is the strongest risk factor in hip (hazard ratio [HR]?=?2.3 per 10-year increase), pelvis (HR?=?1.8), upper leg (HR?=?1.8), and clavicle (HR?=?1.7) models. Age has a weaker association with wrist (HR?=?1.1), rib (HR?=?1.2), lower leg (not statistically significant), and ankle (HR?=?0.81) fractures. Greater weight is associated with reduced risk for hip, pelvis, spine, and wrist, but higher risk for first lower leg and ankle fractures. Prior fracture of the same bone, although significant in nine of 10 models, is most strongly associated with spine (HR?=?6.6) and rib (HR?=?4.8) fractures. Past falls are important in all but spine models. Model c indices are =0.71 for hip, pelvis, upper leg, spine, clavicle, and rib, but =0.66 for upper arm/shoulder, lower leg, wrist, and ankle fractures. The c index for combining hip, spine, upper arm, and wrist (major fracture) is 0.67. First-time fracture models have c indices ranging from 0.59 for wrist to 0.78 for hip and pelvis. The c index for first-time major fracture is 0.63. In conclusion, substantial differences in risk profiles exist among the 10 bones considered. (c) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
引用
收藏
页码:1907 / 1915
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1432-1435
[2]
An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women [J].
Black, DM ;
Steinbuch, M ;
Palermo, L ;
Dargent-Molina, P ;
Lindsay, R ;
Hoseyni, MS ;
Johnell, O .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (07) :519-528
[3]
Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators in Older Women [J].
Bolland, Mark J. ;
Siu, Amanda T. Y. ;
Mason, Barbara H. ;
Horne, Anne M. ;
Ames, Ruth W. ;
Grey, Andrew B. ;
Gamble, Greg D. ;
Reid, Ian R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (02) :420-427
[4]
A Comparison of Prediction Models for Fractures in Older Women Is More Better? [J].
Ensrud, Kristine E. ;
Lui, Li-Yung ;
Taylor, Brent C. ;
Schousboe, John T. ;
Donaldson, Meghan G. ;
Fink, Howard A. ;
Cauley, Jane A. ;
Hillier, Teresa A. ;
Browner, Warren S. ;
Cummings, Steven R. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (22) :2087-2094
[5]
Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: The global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women [J].
Gehlbach, Stephen ;
Saag, Kenneth G. ;
Adachi, Jonathan D. ;
Hooven, Fred H. ;
Flahive, Julie ;
Boonen, Steven ;
Chapurlat, Roland D. ;
Compston, Juliet E. ;
Cooper, Cyrus ;
Diez-Perez, Adolfo ;
Greenspan, Susan L. ;
LaCroix, Andrea Z. ;
Netelenbos, J. Coen ;
Pfeilschifter, Johannes ;
Rossini, Maurizio ;
Roux, Christian ;
Sambrook, Philip N. ;
Silverman, Stuart ;
Siris, Ethel S. ;
Watts, Nelson B. ;
Lindsay, Robert .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (03) :645-653
[6]
EVALUATING THE YIELD OF MEDICAL TESTS [J].
HARRELL, FE ;
CALIFF, RM ;
PRYOR, DB ;
LEE, KL ;
ROSATI, RA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 247 (18) :2543-2546
[7]
The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW): rationale and study design [J].
Hooven, F. H. ;
Adachi, J. D. ;
Adami, S. ;
Boonen, S. ;
Compston, J. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Delmas, P. ;
Diez-Perez, A. ;
Gehlbach, S. ;
Greenspan, S. L. ;
LaCroix, A. ;
Lindsay, R. ;
Netelenbos, J. C. ;
Pfeilschifter, J. ;
Roux, C. ;
Saag, K. G. ;
Sambrook, P. ;
Silverman, S. ;
Siris, E. ;
Watts, N. B. ;
Anderson, F. A., Jr. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (07) :1107-1116
[8]
Hosmer D.W., 2008, Applied Survival Analysis, V2nd
[9]
The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women [J].
Kanis, J. A. ;
Oden, A. ;
Johnell, O. ;
Johansson, H. ;
De Laet, C. ;
Brown, J. ;
Burckhardt, P. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Christiansen, C. ;
Cummings, S. ;
Eisman, J. A. ;
Fujiwara, S. ;
Glueer, C. ;
Goltzman, D. ;
Hans, D. ;
Krieg, M.-A. ;
La Croix, A. ;
McCloskey, E. ;
Mellstrom, D. ;
Melton, L. J., III ;
Pols, H. ;
Reeve, J. ;
Sanders, K. ;
Schott, A.-M. ;
Silman, A. ;
Torgerson, D. ;
van Staa, T. ;
Watts, N. B. ;
Yoshimura, N. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 18 (08) :1033-1046
[10]
Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Johnell, O ;
Oden, A ;
Dawson, A ;
De Laet, C ;
Jonsson, B .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (12) :989-995