Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations

被引:587
作者
Snyder, Claire F. [1 ]
Aaronson, Neil K. [2 ]
Choucair, Ali K. [3 ]
Elliott, Thomas E. [4 ]
Greenhalgh, Joanne [5 ]
Halyard, Michele Y. [6 ]
Hess, Rachel [7 ]
Miller, Deborah M. [8 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [9 ,10 ]
Santana, Maria [11 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Essentia Hlth, Essentia Inst Rural Hlth, Duluth, MN USA
[5] Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Mayo Clin, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[10] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[11] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical practice; Guidelines; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; ROUTINE PRACTICE; CANCER-PATIENTS; HEALTH; CARE; INFORMATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Purpose While clinical care is frequently directed at making patients "feel better," patients' reports on their functioning and well-being (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) are rarely collected in routine clinical practice. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) has developed a User's Guide for Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. This paper summarizes the key issues from the User's Guide. Methods Using the literature, an ISOQOL team outlined considerations for using PROs in clinical practice; options for designing the intervention; and strengths, weaknesses, and resource requirements associated with each option. Results Implementing routine PRO assessment involves a number of methodological and practical decisions, including (1) identifying the goals for collecting PROs in clinical practice, (2) selecting the patients, setting, and timing of assessments, (3) determining which questionnaire(s) to use, (4) choosing a mode for administering and scoring the questionnaire, (5) designing processes for reporting results, (6) identifying aids to facilitate score interpretation, (7) developing strategies for responding to issues identified by the questionnaires, and (8) evaluating the impact of the PRO intervention on the practice. Conclusions Integrating PROs in clinical practice has the potential to enhance patient-centered care. The online version of the User's Guide will be updated periodically.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1314
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]
Assessment of quality of life and participation within an outpatient rehabilitation setting (vol 31 pg 906, 2009) [J].
Ackerley, Suzanne J. ;
Gordon, Heather J. ;
Elston, Alison F. ;
Crawford, Lorna M. ;
McPherson, Kathryn M. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (13) :1107-1107
[2]
Assessment of quality of life and participation within an outpatient rehabilitation setting [J].
Ackerley, Suzanne J. ;
Gordon, Heather J. ;
Elston, Alison F. ;
Crawford, Lorna M. ;
McPherson, Kathryn M. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (11) :906-913
[3]
[Anonymous], 1963, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research
[4]
[Anonymous], 1998, Design and analysis of group-randomized trials
[5]
[Anonymous], ASSESSING QUALITY LI
[6]
[Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
[7]
Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care [J].
Baker, GR .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (03) :150-151
[8]
What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare? [J].
Batalden, Paul B. ;
Davidoff, Frank .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (01) :2-3
[9]
Developing and testing changes in delivery of care [J].
Berwick, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (08) :651-656
[10]
The science of improvement [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (10) :1182-1184